Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 4 Feb 2014 16:08:16 +0100 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Steve Kates wrote: "Hollande, who is a first rate economist, went into
government as a Keynesian but a Keynesian he no longer is. Why anyone
else still is remains the central question in economic theory today."
Hollande "a first rate economist"? "a Keynesian he no longer is"?
Steve should stop talking about French politics. These comments are
nothing but a profound misrepresentation and they are laughable. No
disrespect to the president but this is news to me that he is a first
rate economist. Based on what? He was trained in law, taught economics
but I have no knowledge of a publication record of any sort. I would
be happy to see references of peer-reviewed articles for instance. A
politician, he definitely is.
As for the assertion that he is no longer a keynesian, this is false.
One should carefully review the current economic policy: level of
public spending, welfare policy, etc... There is absolutely no
concrete evidence to back up Steve's claim. Moreover, as Alain
Alcouffe previously noted, Steve's translation of F. Hollande's words
was not totally accurate.
For anyone who carefully follows French politics, Hollande's statement
should be contextualized. There are upcoming municipal elections in
March and european elections in May. The polls are not encouraging for
the Parti Socialiste and its allies. Furthermore, the president is
very unpopular. The president clearly tried to flirt with voters from
the other side and the business community. And I shall add that this
is routine for French presidents. Midterm elections are usually bad
for their party (and allies) and those years they do not hesitate to
appeal to the other side in their speeches. I recall Chirac and
Sarkozy using the same tactics (appealing to the left I mean).
Are antikeynesians so desperate that they have to resort to that kind
of clumsy remarks? Anyway, those who want to continue their
antikeynesian rant are free to do so but please, leave French politics
aside. Or, at least, provide a true depiction of facts and claims.
Guy Numa
|
|
|