SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
Societies for the History of Economics <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Date:
Wed, 26 Dec 2012 10:39:24 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Reply-To:
Societies for the History of Economics <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (8 lines)
There seem to me to be a good number of troubling matters in Carol M.
Connell's account of the doings of Matheson etc.  To address one of the most
accessible, I find the claim, <<In 1830, as a member of the House of Commons
from Sutherland, James Matheson delivered an address in Parliament>> rather
surprising.  Can we be sure it is quite correct?

Rob Tye, York, UK

ATOM RSS1 RSS2