Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Fri, 23 Apr 2021 13:05:59 -0400 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="windows-1252" |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
quoted-printable |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Has anyone written a good biographical account of the relationship between Keynes and Wittgenstein? I had to piece it together from quite a lot of different places, although much in Skidelsky of course. As I recall both were very involved intellectually with the more elderly Russell at Cambridge, and both had big, perhaps terminal, arguments with him. Keynes in 1915 – a matter which Keynes still felt a need to address more than 20 years later in “Early Beliefs”. Wittgenstein in 1922 - in Switzerland I think – after which Russell is reported to have said “he is now completely stupid”
I think Keynes got together with Wittgenstein around 1925 and got him back to London in 1929. Paid the ticket, housed him, fixed him up with a post at Cambridge, and much later, canvassed for his professorship. All this is common knowledge to many I am sure – but I never found anyone digging far into what seems to be at the heart of the matter, which was in part a clear joint dislike of Russell’s political activism.
The one book I did find useful is Carabelli’s “On Keynes's Method”. She argues that the later philosophy of Wittgenstein is really there in Keynes himself from the very start - and even hints that Keynes’ own philosophical shadow fell, via Wittgenstein, onwards to Feyerabend etc. My only difference with Prof Carabelli seemed to concern whether this was a good thing. I am rather with Ernest Gelner on all that – as it seems was Russell.
Rob Tye
|
|
|