SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
Societies for the History of Economics <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: SHOE: QUERY--Smith
From:
Eric Schliesser <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 2 Apr 2009 10:43:31 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Reply-To:
Societies for the History of Economics <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (7 lines) 
Why does this need to be an either/or argument? Smith recognized 
epistemic and moral limitations in humans as well as markets that 
could operate for centuries above their natural price (due to human 
institutions or some natural supply and demand conditions).

Eric Schliesser

ATOM RSS1 RSS2