SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date:
Tue, 5 Apr 2011 11:17:58 -0400
Reply-To:
Societies for the History of Economics <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Gary Mongiovi <[log in to unmask]>
MIME-Version:
1.0
In-Reply-To:
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Sender:
Societies for the History of Economics <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (51 lines)
Alan: The first use was a 1962 review by Joan Robinson, in the EJ (Vol. 72, pp. 690-692), of Harry Johnson's  Money, Trade & Economic Growth.

Gary

Gary Mongiovi, Co-Editor
Review of Political Economy
Economics & Finance Department
St John's University
Jamaica, NEW YORK 11439 (USA)

Tel: +1 (990)-7380
Email: [log in to unmask]
________________________________________
From: Societies for the History of Economics [[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Henry, John [[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2011 10:52 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [SHOE] Bastard Keynesianism

Alan,

Try "What has become of the Keynesian revolution?" (1979) in Collected Economic Papers, Vol. V

John

John F. Henry
Department of Economics
University of Missouri-Kansas City
5100 Rockhill Road
Kansas City, MO 64110-2499

Email: [log in to unmask]
Office Phone: (816) 235-1309
Department Phone: (816) 235-2405
Fax: (816) 235-2834

-----Original Message-----
From: Societies for the History of Economics [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Alan Freeman
Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2011 9:28 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [SHOE] Bastard Keynesianism

Dear friends
I am about to publish an article in which I wish to refer to Joan Robinson's
use of the term 'Bastard Keynesianism'. Does anyone know of a citable
source, preferably by Robinson, that could accompany the reference? The more
explanation this source provides, the better, though of course, it is also
important to trace the term back to its original first usage if this can be
done.

Regards
Alan Freeman

ATOM RSS1 RSS2