SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Societies for the History of Economics <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 5 Oct 2011 13:35:07 -0500
Content-Disposition:
inline
Reply-To:
Societies for the History of Economics <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; DelSp="Yes"; format="flowed"
From:
"Evelyn L. Forget" <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (127 lines)
Let me add my voice to the mix, particularly since JHET was  
referenced. It seems to me a real violation of the author's (and  
referee's) privacy for a journal to make referee reports from a couple  
of years ago available to other researchers.

We have an implicit contract with both referees and authors, but I've  
certainly refereed for agencies that have an EXPLICIT contract that  
indicates the agency will not reveal the name of the referee, and asks  
a referee to commit to keep confidential all items shared as part of  
the process before the paper (or grant application) is released to the  
referee. Violations can be (and are) treated as academic dishonesty.  
(No time limit is mentioned.)

It never occurred to me that we needed such an explicit contract, but  
perhaps we ought to think about it.

Evelyn Forget
---------------


At Wed, 5 Oct 2011 13:52:02 -0400, Gary Mongiovi wrote:

> I agree. I wonder whether there are any generally accepted  
> conventions concerning the publication of passages extracted from  
> referee reports. It is not only the referee who might be compromised  
> by the publication of such remarks, but also the  
> not-always-anonymous author of the paper being refereed, who can  
> come in for some pretty rough treatment.
>
> As an editor, I would be extremely hesitant to publish any part of a  
> referee report that was less than a quarter of a century old, and I  
> could easily be persuaded that the cut-off ought to be fifty years.  
> A possible exception might be a passage that conveyed the scientific  
> views of the ref, independently of the content of the paper being  
> reffed, and that contained no info that might identify the paper  
> under review.
>
> Gary
>
>
> Gary Mongiovi, Co-Editor
> Review of Political Economy
> Economics & Finance Department
> St John's University
> Jamaica, NEW YORK 11439 (USA)
>
> Tel: +1 (718) 990-7380
> Email: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Societies for the History of Economics [[log in to unmask]] On  
> Behalf Of Kevin Hoover [[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2011 1:16 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [SHOE] Paul Samuelson files at Duke (and elsewere?)
>
> As an editor I am a little horrified by the idea that referee  
> reports from as recently as 2004/2005 should be readily available,  
> whether their author is with us or not.  The system of peer  
> evaluation relies on confidentiality, and while ultimately such  
> reports might become fodder for historians, having them come  
> available so soon would undermine the system of peer review.
>
> Kevin Hoover
> Editor, History of Political Economy
>
> On 10/5/2011 11:46 AM, Stanislaw Kwiatkowski wrote:
>
> Dear list,
>
> I'm trying to track down a couple of reports Samuelson wrote as a
> reviewer for the Journal of History of Economic Thought. I know as a
> fact, that he did a couple reviews in 2004/2005. But the
> Samuelson-JHET correspondence file ends in 2002.
>
> Any ideas if there are other places, that have parts of Samuelsons files?
>
> The updated Duke inventory is attached - the online version is outdated.
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Stan Kwiatkowski,
> Poland
>
>
> --
> Stanis?aw Kwiatkowski
> Instytut Misesa
> www.mises.pl<http://www.mises.pl>
> +48 609711878
> [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
>
>
>
> --
> **************************************************************
> KEVIN D. HOOVER
>   Professor of Economics and Philosophy
>   Duke University
>   Editor, History of Political Economy
>
> E-mail [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
> Webpage  www.econ.duke.edu/~kdh9/<http://www.econ.duke.edu/~kdh9/>
>
> Telephone (919) 660-1876
>  Fax (919) 684-8974
>
> Economics:  primary mailing address
>   Department of Economics
>   213 Social Sciences Building
>   Box 90097
>   Duke University
>   Durham, North Carolina 27708-0097
>
> Philosophy
>   Department of Philosophy
>   201 West Duke Building
>   Duke University
>   Box 90743
>   Durham, North Carolina 27708-0743
>
>
>
>
> ***************************************************************
> ***************************************************************

ATOM RSS1 RSS2