SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
[log in to unmask] (G Fontana)
Date:
Fri Mar 31 17:18:37 2006
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
Date:          Sun, 23 Jul 1995 14:44:57 -0400 (EDT) 
From:          Roderick Hay <[log in to unmask]> Subject:       Re: Proof in the History of Economics 
To:            [log in to unmask] 
Cc:            [log in to unmask] 
Reply-to:      [log in to unmask] 
 
Surely the question is quite simple, despite the length of the posts on  
this topic. Can the banks (or governments) motivate people to use  
resources productively, that would not otherwise be used? If so then  
further productivity and growth rates will be higher. If not then there  
may be some misallocation of resources, causing lower future growth  
rates. The rest of the twaddle is irrelevant. 
        Rod 
 
The question should be different in the accent if we accept that banks  
"cannot increase or reduce their loan portfolios at their initiative"  
(Moore Basil, 1988); in other words bank loans are made primarily at  
the initiative of the borrower, especially where the credit lines have  
been previously negotiated.  
Giuseppe 
 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2