SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
[log in to unmask] (Robin Foliet Neill)
Date:
Fri Mar 31 17:18:26 2006
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines)
----------------- HES POSTING ----------------- 
 
There is a clear distinction between the History of Ideas and Intellectual  
History.  In its broad sweep, though not in the detail of its execution,  
Schumpeter's HISTORY OF ECONOMIC ANALYSIS is a history of  
ideas.  The history of ideas does not have a political dimension.  That  
is it does not have political movements and events as an external  
referent in its mode of procedure.  Schumpeter was correct on this  
showing, if what I understand is being said of Schumpeter is correct.  
But a question remains as to whether the History of Economics is a  
subdiscipline of the History of Ideas or of Intellectual History.   
 
Robin Neill 
 
------------ FOOTER TO HES POSTING ------------ 
For information, send the message "info HES" to [log in to unmask] 
 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2