SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
[log in to unmask] (Humberto Barreto)
Date:
Fri Mar 31 17:19:10 2006
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
----------------- HES POSTING ----------------- 
 
>Smith liked the merchants and retailers who 
>demonstrated prudence, self-reliance and attention to details, but not the 
>"big picture" types who imagined a new future, etc. 
 
The way I remember it is that Smith separated the two, projector and 
adventurer, according to how well the venture turned out.  It was an ex 
post perspective that fit in well with his prodigal and frugal types. 
 
Surely Smith would say that Gates, today, after tremendous success, is a 
positive contributor.  But what I've wonder is what Smith would say in 1977 
about Bill Gates? 
 
Like Larry, I'm curious about what others think . . . 
 
Humberto Barreto 
 
------------ FOOTER TO HES POSTING ------------ 
For information, send the message "info HES" to [log in to unmask] 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2