SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
[log in to unmask] (Warren Samuels)
Date:
Fri Mar 31 17:19:10 2006
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines)
----------------- HES POSTING ----------------- 
 
In reply to Pat Gunning's question: 
 
Well, I would not adopt a preconception which defined economics as equal to neoclassical
economics, and thereby omitted Austrian, Institutionalist, Marxist, ...
economics/economists.
 
How is that for starters? I might like the idea of "a unified method of reasoning," but I
would be wary of adopting ONE such method as THE criterion.
 
Warren Samuels 
 
------------ FOOTER TO HES POSTING ------------ 
For information, send the message "info HES" to [log in to unmask] 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2