TWAIN-L Archives

Mark Twain Forum

TWAIN-L@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-transfer-encoding:
7BIT
Sender:
Mark Twain Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Date:
Tue, 8 Apr 1997 10:50:17 -0500
MIME-version:
1.0
Content-type:
TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII
Reply-To:
Mark Twain Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (22 lines)
Any lawyers involved can mediate.  As I understand it:

You can't "libel" a dead person, period.  An estate can't sue
for libel of the diseased.

There is a different standard for libel and slander when it
involves a public figure.  That doesn't mean there's no
standard (Carol Burnett and others have successfully sued
tabloids), but it is relevant here.  As I understand how such
things have worked, it is precisly the kind of statement that
Hoffman has made that first amendment jurisprudence expands to
cover when we're dealing with a public figure.

And one more thing:  in the U.S., truth is an absolute
defense against libel.  So if the diseased or his estate
could sue, then we could discuss the historical record, which
is what I suggested we do.  But folks, that can be mighty
dangerous for a plaintiff.  Witness Oscar Wilde:  he ended up
in jail because HE sued the Marquis of Queensbury for libel.

Glen Johnson

ATOM RSS1 RSS2