SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Societies for the History of Economics <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 15 Nov 2013 10:27:50 -0500
Reply-To:
Societies for the History of Economics <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
In-Reply-To:
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
From:
Alan G Isaac <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines)
On 11/15/2013 9:27 AM, Bylund, Per L. wrote:
> I assume Steve means "obvious" in a different way than the
> layman's simple observation that you exemplify it with.
> Another way of saying it is that economics, perhaps with
> Keynesianism exempted (?), is a deductive science.


And of course such assertions boil down to:
"it follows from my preferred AXIOMS that the
world much match my beliefs about it".

Again, this is just another way of immunizing
against the empirical evidence.

The term "obvious" is generally a pretty strong
signal that thinking has stopped.

Cheers,
Alan Isaac

ATOM RSS1 RSS2