SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Societies for the History of Economics <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 16 Nov 2013 08:36:48 -0500
Reply-To:
Societies for the History of Economics <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
In-Reply-To:
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
From:
Alan G Isaac <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
On 11/15/2013 7:00 PM, Steve Kates wrote:
> the econometric work of Alesina


Alesina, Alberto, 2012,
"Fiscal Policy after the Great Recession"
http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs11293-012-9337-z
provides a summary of recent empirical studies:

      "The range of the spending multiplier estimated using
      these various approaches is from .4 to 1.5, with some
      estimates even lower than .4 and some estimates larger
      than 1.5.  However, most fall in the .4 to 1.5 range."


The standard value for a "Classical" spending multiplier is 0.

Alan Isaac

ATOM RSS1 RSS2