TWAIN-L Archives

Mark Twain Forum

TWAIN-L@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Mark Twain Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Joe Alvarez <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 4 Sep 1993 18:35:01 -0400
In-Reply-To:
Reply-To:
Mark Twain Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (13 lines)
As a conference attendee, I found Hoffman's comments--which, he carefully
noted twice I believe, came from "circumstantial evidence"--interesting
and possible.  Several Twain scholars sat with clenched jaws (and other
body parts?), but Hoffman was commended for reporting his findings and,
especially, for consulting a San Franciscan, a specialist in gay history.
Of course, the traditional explanations could also stand.

The news item announcing the Clemens-de Quille "engagement" does seem more
like a joke than reality.  But . . .I, too, am interested in hearing from
Twain scholars on this issue.

Joe Alvarez

ATOM RSS1 RSS2