SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
[log in to unmask] (James Henderson)
Date:
Fri Mar 31 17:18:46 2006
In-Reply-To:
Message-ID:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (29 lines)
        I struggled with the issue of defining "a school of  
economics" while researching William Whewell and the other  
early mathematical economists in Britain.  I concluded that  
while there were clear connections between these writers,  
still they did not consistitute a "school of thought"   
(hence the term the "Whewell GROUP of Mathematical  
Economists").    Drawing on Henry Spiegel, I argued that --  
"Fairly general agreement defines the sociological  
characteristics of a school of economic thought. Henry W.  
Spiegel, for instance, notes that a school consists of 'a  
recognized leader, a closely knit group of followers to  
exalt and spread the doctrines of the master, and a  
periodical to help in their dissemination.'  Such schools  
frequently have a geographic base, institutional links, and  
access to or control over a journal. Finally, 'the founders  
of influential schools devoted many years to their nurture' 
(Spiegel 1971, 183 - 184)."    While the Whewell Group  
shared several of these sociological characteristics,  
certain crucial elements were missing.  See James P.  
Henderson *Early British Mathematical Economics, William  
Whewell and the British Case* pp. 2 - 3. 
        I look forward to others' take on this issue 
 
Jim Henderson 
 
 
 
 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2