Subject: | |
From: | |
Date: | Fri Mar 31 17:18:39 2006 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
----------------- HES POSTING -----------------
Dear Michael and others,
I'm sure Dan Hammond can give you a long list of references. I have only one
reference, as a result of the fact that I read this book with some of my students last
semester:
Friedman, Milton (1982) Capitalism and Freedom. Chicago: University of
Chicago Press, p. 50:
"Any system which gives so much power and so much discretion to a few men
that mistakes -- excusably or not -- can have such far-reaching effects is
a bad system. It is a bad system to believers in freedom just because it
gives a few men such power without any effective check by the body politic
-- this is the key political argument against an 'independent' central
bank. But it is a bad system even to those who set security higher than
freedom. Mistakes, excusable or not, cannot be avoided in a system which
disperses responsibility yet gives a few men great power, and which thereby
makes important policy actions highly dependent on accidents of
personality. This is the key technical argument against an 'independent'
bank."
I cringed every time I copied "men," but thought you might still find this
reference helpful. It is followed by a dicussion of rules vs. discretion
that discusses the law along the lines you suggested (pp. 51-55).
--Esther-Mirjam Sent
University of Notre Dame
------------ FOOTER TO HES POSTING ------------
For information, send the message "info HES" to [log in to unmask]
|
|
|