Subject: | |
From: | |
Date: | Fri Mar 31 17:18:25 2006 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
===================== HES POSTING ====================
Explaining the outcomes of revolutionary battles involves an assessment of
the relative strengths and weaknesses of the forces mustered. This need
not - nor should it - involve 'taking sides' in the manner described and
(rightly criticised) by Bradley Bateman.
But neither should historians assume that an author is taking sides because
he finds a disparity of intellectual forces (or forces inappropriately
alligned - like the guns in Singapore in 1941-2 facing the wrong way).
Because we are aware of the existence and the emotions of civil war
veterans from the recent revolutions in economics (econometrics, Walrasian,
Keynesian, Monetarist, New Classical) this should not lead us to falsely
assume that those who seek to explain the process of revolutionary victory
or defeat are either Whiggish or embittered.
Revolutions create their own mythology; often these mythologies becomes
(via textbooks and authoritative repetition) deeply embedded in our
collective wisdom. Too many scholars feel threatened by attempts to
analyse our collective mythology; and prefer instead to label such work as
'partisan'. Hence it took me 5 or 6 attempts to explain on this list a few
weeks ago that I was not praising George Stigler but recognising the
superior intellectual equipment that he weilded in the Chicago
counter-revolution (superior in his understanding of the sociology of
professional economic knowledge construction and destruction, relative to
his opponents).
All the qualities that we admire in historical scholarship can be used to
explain the outcomes of intellectual revolutions and the mythologies that
they create. This is a much neglected area of research. For it to
flourish, it requires that readers do not assume that an author is 'waving
the bloody flag' for one side or another; neither subscribing to Whiggish
or to 'what could have been' interpretations of history.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Robert Leeson
Bradley Fellow and Visiting Associate Professor
Economics Department
Social Science Centre
The University of Western Ontario
London, Ontario, Canada, N6A 5C2
============ FOOTER TO HES POSTING ============
For information, send the message "info HES" to [log in to unmask]
|
|
|