Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 9 May 1997 18:35:12 PDT |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
At 04:59 PM 5/9/97 EDT, Taylor Roberts forwarded:
> One
>of my student's papers is suspiciously excellent--several letter grades
>better than the last paper. The student quotes a number of sources from
>the Internet (I found them in the MarkTwainMiningCo. site) so I know the
>student knows how to "surf" the net..
Transitional material looks good wrapped around Twain's writing
--anyone who reads and enjoys Twain can write decently about it.
Is this a case where Twain's work improved the student's mind
so much in one term that the Instructor is midwife to a miracle?
On this list are curious people whose prurient instincts beg to see
a piece of this student's usual performance and the work that's
"several letter grades better."
Until then, we cannot say much conclusively....Writing ain't that hard for
half the students...a body without a mind need not resort to the
web for help.
The "loner" who does his own cheating will be anomalous...
Most cheaters run in packs, sometimes calling themselves a
"department" . . . . sometimes not. :-)
By the way, my directed study course in Mark Twain
received a 4.0 (don't blame the Professor)
but my report on brain-mind education for the
Dr. of Education came back marked with a "0"
-- perhaps he thought I cheated.
I had previously received a 4..0 in
Neuroscience, writing capsules of
Scientific American articles about the brain -- SA
articles which the teacher specifically read and assigned.
Hope you enjoyed that.
Mike Pearson
|
|
|