Mime-Version: |
1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085) |
Sender: |
|
Date: |
Mon, 7 Jan 2013 10:33:12 -0500 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
quoted-printable |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Harold - The ms is held by MT Papers. If I remember correctly, it was written as a response to an attempt to ban "Leaves of Grass" specifically. It exposes the absurdity of banning ribald modern work against a background of respected, yet more ribald, classic works. The relative dates are not in my head at the moment, but I wonder if WW's Controversy inspired Twain's "1601."
On Jan 7, 2013, at 9:38 AM, Harold Bush wrote:
> Really? That's an intriguing tidbit, never heard about that one... Alan;
> or anyone -- have you read that essay? and if so: what's the context of
> MT's coverage of WW?
>
> -hb
>
> On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 10:25 PM, Alan Gribben <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>> Twain showed familiarity with the controversy about his verse in a n=
>> ever-completed essay written around 1880.
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Harold K. Bush, Ph.D
> Professor of English
> Saint Louis University
> St. Louis, MO 63108
> 314-977-3616 (w); 314-771-6795 (h)
> <www.slu.edu/x23809.xml>
Alan Kitty
609-219-9339
[log in to unmask]
www.marktwainslaststand.com
|
|
|