SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
[log in to unmask] (Patrick Gunning)
Date:
Fri Mar 31 17:19:17 2006
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (29 lines)
================= HES POSTING ================= 
 
 
Ross B. Emmett wrote: 
 
>       While the economist may 
> want to provide alternative solutions to particular issues, my only real 
> "policy-oriented" interest is this: why is it that in the twentieth 
> century modern society came to rely on economic science for "solutions" 
> to social issues? Or put better: why is it that modern society framed its 
> "issues" in ways amenable to being addressed by the social sciences? Or 
> again: what is it about modern society that elevates "science" and 
> thereby economics to the status previously given to the priesthood? 
 
 
Ross, if you do not first separate economics from technology, you will not 
be able to untangle the mix of influences needed to answer your questions. 
Have ordinary people typically turned to the priest in order to deal with 
inflation and unemployment? Or to find a better job or a more profitable 
business deal? 
 
Patrick Gunning 
National Chung Hsing University 
 
============ FOOTER TO HES POSTING ============ 
For information, send the message "info HES" to [log in to unmask] 
 
 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2