SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
[log in to unmask] (Robert Leeson)
Date:
Fri Mar 31 17:19:17 2006
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines)
================= HES POSTING ================= 
 
Brad Bateman: 
 
Ah ha!  Now I understand why we are talking at cross purposes.  I am not 
claiming that Stigler was a great historian; I am claiming that his 
historical/sociological understanding informed his research agenda (and the 
Chicago counter-revolution).  Perhaps we mean something different by "Whig" 
history; what Stigler wrote about the "kinky demand curve" and monopolistic 
competition does not suggest that he believed that 'truth' would vanquish 
'error.'  He had a very clear understanding about the hierarchy of 
influence. 
 
Robert Leeson 
 
============ FOOTER TO HES POSTING ============ 
For information, send the message "info HES" to [log in to unmask] 
 
 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2