Subject: | |
From: | |
Date: | Fri Mar 31 17:19:10 2006 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
----------------- HES POSTING -----------------
I think Larry and Humberto are both on the right track. My impression is
that Smith distinguishes between projector and venturer on the basis of
risk. Hence his bias against visionary types, whose utopian projects do
undermine the prudential values Smith deems important. This will often
look like an ex post perspective. Nevertheless, (an estimate of) risk is
reflected in the rate of interest at which the project is financed, and this
is available from the start. If I am not mistaken Smith's discussion is
motivated, too, by concerns about how projectors -- borrowing at high rates
--displace more viable and productive investments.
Bentham's letter on Usury should be mentioned as an insightful early
response to Adam Smith, especially for those interested in the early
recognition of the importance of entrepeneurs.
Eric Schliesser
Department of Philosophy
University of Chicago
------------ FOOTER TO HES POSTING ------------
For information, send the message "info HES" to [log in to unmask]
|
|
|