SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Date:
Fri Mar 31 17:18:33 2006
Message-ID:
Subject:
From:
[log in to unmask] (Ross B. Emmett)
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (73 lines)
======================= HES POSTING =================== 
 
CALL FOR PAPERS 
 
The Tenth International Congress on the Enlightenment 
University College, Dublin, July 25-31, 1999 
 
Round Table on 
 
"The phenomenon of marginality: 
non-treatise philosophy in the Age of Enlightenment" 
 
     In the  Round  Table   we  would  discuss  basic problems of 
philosophy in the Age of Enlightenment. We think  that the way of 
philosophising  and  forms   of  philosophical   reflection   are 
important enough to be discussed. There are two  general  ways to 
reflect  philosophical ideas   and, respectively,  two  types  of 
philosophical   texts:   <scientific  treatise>    and  <text  of 
culture>. We have a lot of examples  when philosophy  is  written 
almost entirely in non-treatise forms  (Russian  philosophy,  for 
example). Very often philosophical  ideas were  reflected  partly 
in a treatise, partly in another form, e. g.  literature.  We all 
know, that Voltaire was <a great philosopher>, but  the  majority 
of us knows him  only  as an author  of  <Pucelle  d'Orleans>  or 
<Candide>, but not as the author of <Elements  de  la philosophie 
de   Newton>   or  <Traite   de   mEtaphysique>.  Sometimes  only 
metaphysics  had  the treatise  form,   but  social   philosophy, 
philosophy of history, aesthetics,  ethics meditated  in forms of 
literature,  poetry,  public  discussions, allegories,  political 
manifestations etc. The question is whether  any special forms to 
reflect philosophy existed? How to read philosophical  ideas  out 
from different cultural phenomena? What the  strategy of  reading 
should we use? 
     That  is  why searching   and   adequate   understanding  of 
philosophical  meanings of texts  is  very  important to conceive 
the mentality of the epoch. 
     Suggested themes include: 
  Philosophy in the Philosophical Age: The Problem of Understanding 
  Classical and Non-classical Images of Metaphysics 
  Philosophising in Rhymes: Metaphorical Forms of Philosophy 
  The Philosophical Context of Literature's Texts 
  Philosophy of History in Works of Historians 
  Problems of Philosophical Anthropology in Sentimental Prose 
  Social Philosophy in Utopias and <Political Novels> 
  Heroes of the Pedagogical Novel as Categories of Ethics 
  Philosophical Category and Literature Metaphor 
  Philosophy as <a Metaphysical Novel> 
 
All interested people are welcome to add to the list 
 
To participate please submit an 100 world abstract and brief CV by 20 
March, 1998, preferably by e-mail to: 
 
Dr. Tatiana V. Artemieva, 
Academic Secretary, St. Petersburg Institute of Human Studies, 
Russian Academy of Sciences, 
P. O. Box 264, B-358, St. Petersburg 194358, Russia; 
email: [log in to unmask] 
or 
Dr. Michael I. Mikeshin, 
Vice-Director, Institute for the History of Science and Technology, 
Russian Academy of Sciences 
e-mail: [log in to unmask] 
Fax +7 (812) 218 4667 
htpp://www.geocities.com/Athens/Delphi/8131 
 
Information about the ISECS meeting is available at 
http://users.ox.ac.uk/~abrown/dublin/index.html 
 
============ FOOTER TO HES POSTING ============ 
For information, send the message "info HES" to [log in to unmask] 
 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2