SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Date:
Fri Mar 31 17:19:12 2006
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
===================== HES POSTING ==================== 
 
McCloskey commented in the intro to his intermediate micro text that 
neoclassical analysis was simply gas diffusion theory brought over 
from physics--each atom retains its momentum until influenced--externally-- 
by some force (e.g. relative price changes).  And one can get a lot of 
mileage out of that approach, as long as the atoms (molecules=firms?) 
don't think/act.  But as T. Schultz pointed out, it is in the interest 
of actors to CREATE disequilibirum to de-stablize stability, because 
there are advantages to be gained by doing so.  Thus introduction of 
humans into the equation guarantees that any formalized model will be 
inherently wrong--because someone will be interested in making it wrong! 
 
FC 
 
********************************************************************** 
Prof. Fred V. Carstensen                   Office: (860) 486-0614 
Department of Economics                    Dept:   (860) 486-3022 
341 Mansfield Road                         FAX:    (860) 486-4463 
University of Connecticut                  Home:   (860) 242-6355 
Storrs, CT 06269-1063                e-mail: [log in to unmask] 
********************************************************************** 
============ FOOTER TO HES POSTING ============ 
For information, send the message "info HES" to [log in to unmask] 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2