TWAIN-L Archives

Mark Twain Forum

TWAIN-L@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
Mark Twain Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 15 Apr 1998 13:40:57 -0400
Reply-To:
Mark Twain Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Rivka Swenson <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Comments:
To: Matthew Miller <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (11 lines)
Well, some might say that there's no way to know what a work was "meant to
contain."  Or, why would any one person be the one to identify that a
given work "contains" some thigns and not others.  What about the role of
the reader?
        I am consciously aware that I've chosen to read MT's Roughing It
in a specific way, with an eye to specific things.  I am willing to
explicate the bulk of the book and "over-analyze" in light of my stated
goal, but I admit I'm doing so.  However, although it's not as if I'm
using anything that isn't "in" the text, I suppose some might find my
reading "wrong"--on what real grounds, though?

ATOM RSS1 RSS2