Mime-Version: |
1.0 (1.0) |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=utf-8 |
Date: |
Sat, 9 Nov 2019 20:33:33 -0800 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
quoted-printable |
Sender: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
My wife and I are planning on seeing Harriet tomorrow night. I will be put out if Ozzie is not in it.
Seriously, though, I hope there’s at least a little about John Brown (not the Scottish doctor) in it.
If “they” ever do a Frederick Douglass flick, I would hope the Langdon family would appear in it.
-- B. Clay Shannon
[log in to unmask]
> On Nov 9, 2019, at 4:31 PM, Martha Sherwood <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> I cannot comment on this film, which I have not seen, but Amazing Grace is
> a good example of a Hollywood movie which has the trappings of historical
> accuracy but portrays events in a thoroughly fictitious manner.
>
> Martha Sherwood
>
>> On Sat, Nov 9, 2019 at 7:15 AM Hal Bush <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>> folks, I believe some of you will be interested:
>>
>> Perhaps this is predictable (it's really, really hard to depict these
>> histories to everyone's satisfaction at the current moment): but the
>> controversy over the new film Harriet is for real (even though it has a
>> full 99% audience-like rating on rotten tomatoes).
>> & ps: I have encouraged my own students to see it (they all read Uncle
>> Tom's Cabin & Douglass' Narrative this semester): I'd love hearing
>> anyone's thoughts about the film, as either a teaching device or just an
>> aesthetic/historical account.
>>
>>
>> https://www.theroot.com/despite-controversies-cynthia-erivo-as-harriet-tubman-1839590139
>>
>>
>>
>> Dr. Hal Bush
>>
>> Professor of English &
>>
>> Director of the Undergraduate Program
>>
>> Saint Louis University
>>
>> [log in to unmask]
>>
>> 314-977-3616
>>
>> http://halbush.com
>>
>> author website: halbush.com
>>
|
|
|