SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
[log in to unmask] (Thomas Leonard)
Date:
Fri Mar 31 17:18:19 2006
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines)
================= HES POSTING ================= 
 
[NOTE: This message comes by way of Robert Goldfarb, and provides a  
different twist on the story that Heilbroner tells. Goldfarb asked  
Leonard if he could identify the difficult/easy juxtapositioning. -- RBE] 
 
Yes. Keynes himself is the source, a commment on Marshall, in his 
remembrance:  
 
J. M. Keynes "Alfred Marshall, 1842-1924" The Economic Journal, Vol. 34, 
No. 135. (Sep., 1924), pp. 311-372. 
 
"The study of economics does not seem to require any specialised gifts of 
an unusually high order.  Is it not, intellectually regarded, a very easy 
subject compared with the higher branches of philosophy and pure science? 
Yet good, or even competent, economists are the rarest of birds. An easy 
subject at which very few excel!"  (pp. 321-22). 
 
Tim Leonard 
 
============ FOOTER TO HES POSTING ============ 
For information, send the message "info HES" to [log in to unmask] 
 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2