SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
[log in to unmask] (Javier Finkman)
Date:
Fri Mar 31 17:18:46 2006
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (15 lines)
Professor Thomas's question suggests (to me at least) another one... 
 
What would be the usefulness (pros and cons) of having another 
organizing concept (besides theory, paradigm or research program) for a 
body of knowledge sharing some (which?) characteristics? 
 
Obviously, theory seems too narrow and paradigm too wide but... one more? 
 
Diversification makes sense only if correlations are substantially 
different from one. 
 
Javier Finkman 
 
 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2