----------------- HES POSTING ----------------- 
This sentence says either: 
[A] 
(1) At times I come across evidence that the policy that I have promoted is 
a bad policy. (2) I always promote the policy that best conforms to all the 
evidence I have. (3) If the new evidence indicates that I should be 
promoting a different policy, then that is what I do.  What do you do?" 
 
[B] 
(1) At times I come across evidence that an hypothesis that I am 
entertaining does not have empirical support. (2) I cease entertaining an 
hypothesis that has been negated by empirical evidence. (3) If I cannot 
adjust the negated hypothesis so that it is no longer negated by the new 
evidence, that is if I can find another hypothesis that better accounts for 
the new and well as old evidence, I will cease entertaining the old 
hypothesis.  What do you do? 
 
Robin Neill 
 
------------ FOOTER TO HES POSTING ------------ 
For information, send the message "info HES" to [log in to unmask]