SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
[log in to unmask] (Timework Web)
Date:
Fri Mar 31 17:19:09 2006
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
----------------- HES POSTING ----------------- 
 
>From "The 'Lump-of-Labor' Case Against Work-Sharing: Populist  
Fallacy or Marginalist Throwback," forthcoming in _Working Time:  
International Trends, Theory and Policy Perspectives_ Routledge Fall  
2000:   
 
"As if to show that Gresham's law -- that bad money drives out good --  
also governs economic discourse, the claim of a lump-of-labor fallacy  
has displaced genuine analysis regarding the complex relationship  
between the hours of work, employment and productivity."   
 
I swear I didn't know about the Frank Knight precedent or I would  
have cited it!   
 
Tom Walker 
TimeWork Web 
http://www.vcn.bc.ca/timework/worksite.htm 
 
------------ FOOTER TO HES POSTING ------------ 
For information, send the message "info HES" to [log in to unmask] 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2