SDOH Archives

Social Determinants of Health

SDOH@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Elaine Power <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Social Determinants of Health <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 28 Feb 2024 14:15:53 -0500
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1405 bytes) , text/html (6 kB)
Ooooh… another book to add to the pile… 


Let’s Set a Maximum Wage for the Rich
According to ‘Limitarianism,’ no one deserves to be a billionaire. Not even Taylor Swift.

Crawford Kilian <https://thetyee.ca/Bios/Crawford_Kilian/> 26 Feb 2024The Tyee

> https://thetyee.ca/Culture/2024/02/26/Set-Maximum-Wage-Rich/ <https://thetyee.ca/Culture/2024/02/26/Set-Maximum-Wage-Rich/>

Limitarianism: The Case Against Extreme Wealth
Ingrid Robeyns
Penguin Random House (2024)
“Eat the rich” may be an attractive idea to some, but let’s face it: the rich are just too few to go around. Their wealth, on the other hand, offers plenty for all.

Instead of fretting about a minimum wage for the poor, let’s set a maximum wage for the rich. Call it a million dollars a year, salary or investment income, with any excess income going straight into tax revenues.

It’s a sign of our oligarchs’ power that such an idea is almost unthinkable. But Ingrid Robeyns, a philosopher and economist at Utrecht University in the Netherlands, explores in detail the idea of limiting private wealth. In her new book Limitarianism: The Case Against Extreme Wealth, she makes a persuasive case and raises some very serious moral, political and economic problems.



To leave, manage or join list: https://listserv.yorku.ca/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=sdoh&A=1



ATOM RSS1 RSS2