SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
[log in to unmask] (Yuri Tulupenko)
Date:
Fri Mar 31 17:18:27 2006
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (28 lines)
----------------- HES POSTING ----------------- 
 
>From W. J. Ashley's Bibliographical Appendix to Mill's Principles (The 
Library of Economics and Liberty 
[http://www.econlib.org/library/Mill/mlP74.html]): 
 
"The German language possesses no one inclusive term like "Wealth"; and 
German economists have long been accustomed to begin with the definition of 
"goods" (Guter) and, in consequence, of "a good" (Gut)-enjoying, in the use 
of the latter term, an advantage not available in current English speech. 
(...) The phrases "goods," "economic goods," "an economic good," and so on, 
have of late years made their way into English and still more into American 
economic writings; see, for instance, Marshall (as above), and Clark, 
Essentials of Economic Theory (1907), ch. 2; and cf. Pierson, Principles of 
Economics (Eng. trans. 1902), pt. i. ch. i." 
 
Regards, 
Yuri Tulupenko 
 
 
 
 
 
 
------------ FOOTER TO HES POSTING ------------ 
For information, send the message "info HES" to [log in to unmask] 
 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2