TWAIN-L Archives

Mark Twain Forum

TWAIN-L@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Mark Twain Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 26 Sep 2013 12:15:42 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (47 lines)
Thanks for link, Kent.  I hope to read your article itself soon.

But have to remark that I had to pause at his "redolent theory."
I wonder what he meant by that!

Are you familiar with the pseudonym for a writer in the 1860s for the
St.Louis Republican, Hans Patrick Le Connor?  I wonder if the "Le Connor"
could be in the spirit of "Josh" and "Snook."  Were there references to
con-men in those days?

Am grateful for your contributions here.  Thanks

Arianne Laidlaw
Sacramento


On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 10:58 AM, Kevin Mac Donnell <
[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> A story about my Mark Twain Journal article on the origins of Mark Twain's
> nom de plume has appeared on the LA Review of Books. Here's the link:
>
> http://lareviewofbooks.org/essay/a-new-theory-on-mark-twain
>
> He does a very nice job of explaining my wonky research to a broader
> readership, although true Twainians should all be loyal subscribers to the
> Mark Twain Journal and read the original.  There is one typo in his
> piece --"mark two" should read "mark 2." I suppose I'd also change "drain"
> to "sewer drain" for clarity.
>
> Kevin
> @
> Mac Donnell Rare Books
> 9307 Glenlake Drive
> Austin TX 78730
> 512-345-4139
> Member: ABAA, ILAB
> *************************
> You may browse our books at
> www.macdonnellrarebooks.com
>



-- 
Arianne Laidlaw A '58

ATOM RSS1 RSS2