SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Date:
Fri Mar 31 17:18:40 2006
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines)
----------------- HES POSTING ----------------- 
Larry Moss said: 
 
<< For example, among the classical school writers the quantity tradition 
held that an overall rise in prices, initiated perhaps by a generalized 
rise in wages, would not stick unless the overall supply of cash (liquid) 
balances were increased as well.>> 
 
This is rather more a "Real Bills" causality than the standard M to P 
causality of the QTM.  There are those that consider "Real Bills" to be a 
"quantity" theory of sorts, but the P to M causality and the strict 
assumption of endogenous money is definitely in diametric opposition to the 
fundamental propositions of the QTM. 
 
Chas Anderson 
 
------------ FOOTER TO HES POSTING ------------ 
For information, send the message "info HES" to [log in to unmask] 
 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2