Subject: | |
From: | |
Date: | Fri Mar 31 17:18:21 2006 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
----------------- HES POSTING -----------------
After observing the various postings on teaching students WN, and largely
agreeing with A. Waterman's post, I thought the List might like to hear
from a student.
I am an Honours student at Murdoch University, Western Australia. Last year
myself and another student made a presentation to our local economics
society regarding our first year tertiary experience. We argued for a
compulsory year long course in the history of economic thought which might
naturally include reading excerpts from some of the classics. We felt
without this history the economic theory we were being taught remained
oblique. As a first year I remember feeling a desperate need for context,
ie. a historical perspective. I
was told that I was in a minority and that most students do not learn
this way. I struggled through first year doggedly trying to learn
neoclassical theory without knowing where it came from, how the concepts
had arisen and changed over time. When I started reading WN by myself it
was almost revelatory. Suddenly the theory I was being taught started to
make more sense. I could see where! ideas and concepts had come from - I
had the context I needed to enable my learning and the contemporary theory
was no longer so intimidating.
It amazes me that those who set the undergraduate economics curriculum fail
to understand the important of context to learning. If you are not prepared
to engage in rote learning as a first year you will not survive. If you
want to challenge, argue, even simply understand your discipline you will
be disappointed and probably drop out of economics. I believe a first year
course in the history of economic thought should be taught simultaneously
with the usual introductory neoclassical theory ( I won't argue for
introductory heterodox theory as I know that will never happen!). Students
are more likely to find their freshman year engaging, satisfying, and yes,
even interesting, wonderfully interesting as the history of economic
thought unfolds.
Judith Cockburn-Campbell
------------ FOOTER TO HES POSTING ------------
For information, send the message "info HES" to [log in to unmask]
|
|
|