TWAIN-L Archives

Mark Twain Forum

TWAIN-L@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
Mark Twain Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Mark Coburn <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 9 Nov 2007 12:42:24 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Mark Twain Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (14 lines)
I've always greatly preferred excluding "The"--even if Twain himself didn't
care much--because its absence suggests that Huck's adventures are or might
be open ended.  The book closes with himnds with him on the run . . . which
leaves the possibility of more adventures to come.

As for Kevin's comment, I've always been happy with THE HAMLET as a title.
It also fits well with its sequels--THE TOWN and THE MANSION.  It's maybe
Faulkner's funniest novel, and features V.K. Ratliff, one of my favorite
characters, and one who shows Faulkner's great debt to Twain. . . . But I
reckon it could be Kevin had that play about the Great Dane in mind, rather
than Billy Faulkner.

Mark Coburn

ATOM RSS1 RSS2