Yes, indeed, or when "its" is spelled "it's."


On 5/15/13 4:10 PM, "Dustin Zima" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:


>Never bodes well when the writer gets the title of the text wrong.=20
>
>On May 15, 2013, at 3:03 PM, Scott Holmes <[log in to unmask]>
>wrote:=
>
>
>> 
>>http://www.crisismagazine.com/2013/the-adventures-of-huckleberry-finn-by-
>>m=
>ark-twain-two-views
>>=20
>> Here are two reviews of Huckleberry Finn, not some much the book but
>> more attempts at describing Huck's character. The comments are equally
>> important and as with the respondent Stella, the Huck defined in these
>> two reviews is not the Huck of my own mind. I view Huck as neither king
>> nor moralist. In fact, I don't see him as heroic at all. I see Huck as
>> someone without ambition finding his own way along the middle path. He
>> recognizes and even accepts the legal and moral structure of the society
>> he exists in, but he has a natural talent for evading it's more virulent
>> aspects. His acts are acts of his heart, not his mind nor his morals.
>