 
| Subject: | |
| From: | |
| Reply To: | |
| Date: | Mon, 9 May 2011 08:29:01 -0400 |
| Content-Type: | text/plain |
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
The answer naturally depends on where you are starting from, and the
way you've framed your question, I'd suspect you've never taken a
macroeconomics course. (Since the topic is typically covered in
undergrad macro.)
So my first recommendation would be Samuelson's Economics, and
particularly his discussion of the neoclassical synthesis. (Later
editions are with Nordhaus.)
The primary source or classic work is Keynes's General Theory.
Jim Lacey
Franklin Pierce University
[log in to unmask]
On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 10:56 PM, Gordon Brady <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Dear Sir:
>
> I have heard several economists say they are part-time Keynesians, part-time
> Monetarists, and part-time All-Schools-of-Thought. Under what
> conditions are Keynesian approaches relevant and good policy? What work is
> good on this?
>
>
>
> Gordon L. Brady, Ph.D., M.S.L.
> Senior Economist
> Joint Tax Committee
> U.S. Congress
> 244 Ford House Office Building
> Washington, DC 20505
> 202.225.6024
>
>
|
|
|
