SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Societies for the History of Economics <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 6 Sep 2011 12:11:13 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (37 lines)
No reply to my last - perhaps my brief search was on the right track, and
the matter of Variation in the Propensity to Save really is little researched?

If anyone can direct me to another more appropriate forum, I would be grateful.

Meanwhile, here is an attempt to add some context to my question

The data that triggered my enquiry is to do with a big upsurge in what
appear to be savings hoards in coin in later 3rd century Romano-British
contexts.

I have reason to believe that this happened at a time when the volume of
cash in circulation had just increased by at least an order of magnitude,
but also, when the economy was still probably not fully monetised in the
sense we understand it today (many would remain in quasi-serfdom).

Thus we must have a group within this late 3rd century generation who were
experiencing money use for the first time, in a way their parents had not. 
Casually playing with this idea, it occurred to me that the reports of high
rates of saving within the current generation in China seemed at least
superficially to be similar, in some ways.

Hence my question.

It is of course possible that the 3rd century rise in savings was just to do
with a straightforward rise in incomes, in much the way I understand Keynes
to have suggested.

Alternatively, that patterns of saving in 3rd century Roman and modern China
are normal, and what we are seeing at the present time is a collapse of
saving in the West under the influence of inflation and welfare payments.

Anyhow, I remain a little puzzled that such matters have apparently not been
more prominently addressed in the literature

Rob Tye

ATOM RSS1 RSS2