TWAIN-L Archives

Mark Twain Forum

TWAIN-L@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Mark Twain Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Date:
Wed, 15 Jan 1997 11:50:17 -0500
Reply-To:
Mark Twain Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
Like everyone else, this is too irresistable a topic for me not to respond.

I'm currently teaching a month long into to lit course where we're going to
be discussing Twain and Huck Finn next week.  But, of course as the Twainian
that I am, I have not been able to resist mentioning him during every other
class.  This discussion fits right in with all that we are discussing--issues
of identity in literature, duality, etc.

The comment:
<<
 Twains juggling of Huck's character as good example/bad example is pure
 magic to me. He never drops the ball. It is that balance, in part, that
 makes Huck so human to me.
  >>

clarifies some of this for me and reinforces my beliefs and studies.  Just as
Twain 'juggled' Huck's character  as 'good example/bad example,' didn't he do
the same with his own character/identity?  He magnificantly juggled the
Clemens/Twain personas throughout his life and career.  HE WAS HIMSELF THE
GOOD EXAMPLE/BAD EXAMPLE--just as he was himself both Tom and Huck, both the
acceptable good, bad boy and the unacceptable bad, bad boy.  But who was the
authentic persona?--ah, back to Pudd'nhead Wilson.  You can't shoot half a
dog and have any dog left!

Carolyn Richey--SDSU & NU

ATOM RSS1 RSS2