TWAIN-L Archives

Mark Twain Forum

TWAIN-L@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Mark Twain Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 5 Feb 2008 12:28:23 -0500
Reply-To:
Mark Twain Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
In-Reply-To:
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
From:
David H Fears <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines)
Good point, Davis, although returning to the scene of one's success is
understandable, I suppose, while attempting to write a sequel to perhaps the
greatest American novel is--well, what would you call it? Some might say
vanity, others foolishness, others laudable.? Save for death of the
protagonist(s) (and possibly not even then) I suppose almost any novel might
be sequelized. There's a whole school of writing called "fanfic" that uses
existing characters and some plotlines (such as writing a Star Trek episode,
etc.)--and this fiction writing is not allowed in some workshops, though it
may be a good way for novices to begin their writing career, even though
some call it plagiarism of the worst order.

Is a sequel to a classic akin to plagiarism? A question which could be
argued either way.

David H. Fears

ATOM RSS1 RSS2