Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 28 Mar 2017 02:24:13 +0300 |
Content-Type: | multipart/alternative |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
The following two books are supposed to be 'discussions of academic politics in Stalinist and post-Stalinist Russia' (according to Francis Spufford's notes in Red Plenty ):
Loren R. Graham (1972). Science and Philosophy in the Soviet Union . New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Slava Gerovitch (2002). From Newspeak to Cyberspeak: A History of Soviet Cybernetics . Boston: The MIT Press.
>-------- Оригинално писмо --------
>От: David Andrews [log in to unmask]
>Относно: Re: [SHOE] Economists and censorship
>До: [log in to unmask]
>Изпратено на: 27.03.2017 21:31
I’m not sure I would call it a methodological study, but there is an interesting essay by Leo Strauss on “Persecution and the Art of Writing” that addresses the issue. It’s published in a book of the same name, U. of Chicago Press, 1952.
David Andrews
From: Societies for the History of Economics <
[log in to unmask] > on behalf of Federico D'Onofrio <
[log in to unmask] >
Reply-To: Societies for the History of Economics <
[log in to unmask] >
Date: Sunday, March 26, 2017 at 5:27 AM
To: <
[log in to unmask] >
Subject: [SHOE] Economists and censorship
Dear all,
One of the issues that strike me whenever I study economists who worked in difficult times and under illiberal regimes such as imperial Russia and Austria-Hungary or fascist Italy is the issue of censorship. This is particularly clear in the case of Marxist economists in 19th century Russia, such as Nikolaj Sieber on whom I am now writing togeher with Francois Allisson and Danila Raskov. Sieber published in censored Russian journals as well as illegal ones published abroad. Is there a methodological study on publication and rhetorical strategies adopted by economists at risk of being censored?
Thank you for your help,
|
|
|