SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Alain Alcouffe <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Societies for the History of Economics <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 26 Feb 2011 17:47:16 +0100
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (918 bytes) , text/html (1402 bytes)
Le 25/02/2011 17:28, Womack, John a écrit :
> I think the best revenge may be to join or create a department or program of the history of sciences, to work alongside historians of chemistry, biology, physics, etc., who now try to understand historically why very smart "scientists" in the past so often got matters in their disciplines so stupidly, disastrously wrong.

Revenge ? Really?
The same kind of situation exists in France and history of economics is 
also downgraded and/or excluded from curriculums, hence  positions for 
historian of economics  are becoming fewer and fewer. But if we consider 
the number of positions for historians of sciences (aactualy the 
category encompasses epistemology, history of sciences and techniques), 
there are only 76 while positions for economists are around 1900. That's 
why I am convinced that the future of history of economics depends upon 
safeguarding  positions in economics.



ATOM RSS1 RSS2