SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Humberto Barreto <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Societies for the History of Economics <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 15 Apr 2024 09:00:30 -0400
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 kB) , text/html (31 kB)
[Selections by Humberto Barreto for SHOE list.]


nep-hpe <https://nep.repec.org/nep-hpe.html> New Economics Papers
<https://nep.repec.org/> on History and Philosophy of Economics

Issue of 2024‒04‒15
papers chosen by
Erik Thomson <http://econpapers.repec.org/RAS/pth72.htm>,
University of Manitoba <http://umanitoba.ca/>

------------------------------

   1. Review of “A Herstory of Economics” by Edith Kuiper
   <https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/#m_-7853878941077407207_p1> By Betancourt,
   Rebeca Gómez
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/search.pf?aus=Betancourt,%20Rebeca%20G%C3%B3mez>
   2. Price controls against “greedflation”: lessons from the debate over
   incomes policy
   <https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/#m_-7853878941077407207_p2> By Basile
   Clerc <http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/search.pf?aus=Basile%20Clerc>
   3. The nature of economic exchange: from “interaction” to “transaction”
   <https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/#m_-7853878941077407207_p3> By Emmanuel
   Petit
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/search.pf?aus=Emmanuel%20Petit>
   4. UNCTAD experts as an intellectual basis for developing countries'
   involvement in the reform of the international monetary system. Paper
   presented at the Summer Institute of the Center for the History of
   Political Economy, Duke University, June 19-22, 2023
   <https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/#m_-7853878941077407207_p4> By Raphaël
   Orange-Leroy
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/search.pf?aus=Rapha%C3%ABl%20Orange-Leroy>
   5. Review of “La science est un jeu: La théorie des jeux dans la France
   des années 1950” by Tarik Tazdaït
   <https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/#m_-7853878941077407207_p5> By Leonard,
   Robert
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/search.pf?aus=Leonard,%20Robert>
   6. Cherry-picked Evidence, Selective Quotations, and Irrelevant Sources:
   James Ahiakpor's Persistent Manipulations of the Historical Record on
   Jean-Baptiste Say, Fred Taylor, and Say's Law
   <https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/#m_-7853878941077407207_p6> By Alain
   Béraud
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/search.pf?aus=Alain%20B%C3%A9raud>; Guy
   Numa <http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/search.pf?aus=Guy%20Numa>
   7. Is There Really a Dictator's Dilemma? Information and Repression in
   Autocracy <https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/#m_-7853878941077407207_p7>
    By Gehlbach, Scott
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/search.pf?aus=Gehlbach,%20Scott>; Luo,
   Zhaotian
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/search.pf?aus=Luo,%20Zhaotian>;
Shirikov,
   Anton
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/search.pf?aus=Shirikov,%20Anton>;
Vorobyev,
   Dmitriy
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/search.pf?aus=Vorobyev,%20Dmitriy>
   8. Management and Microeconomics: A historical comparison between the
   British and the French traditions
   <https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/#m_-7853878941077407207_p8> By Lise
   Arena <http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/search.pf?aus=Lise%20Arena>;
Richard
   Arena <http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/search.pf?aus=Richard%20Arena>
   9. Shannon-Theil-Rawls: Information Theory, Inequality and the Veil of
   Ignorance <https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/#m_-7853878941077407207_p9>
    By Ravi Kanbur
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/search.pf?aus=Ravi%20Kanbur>

------------------------------

   1. Review of “A Herstory of Economics” by Edith Kuiper
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/RePEc:osf:socarx:yc5nb>
   By: Betancourt, Rebeca Gómez
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/search.pf?aus=Betancourt,%20Rebeca%20G%C3%B3mez>
   Abstract: Review of “A Herstory of Economics” by Edith Kuiper.
   Date: 2024–03–15
   URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:osf:socarx:yc5nb&r=hpe
   2. Price controls against “greedflation”: lessons from the debate over
   incomes policy <http://econpapers.repec.org/RePEc:drm:wpaper:2024-11>
   By: Basile Clerc
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/search.pf?aus=Basile%20Clerc>
   Abstract: Why do some economists support price controls in the face of
   inflation during peacetime? Our thesis is that, in the history of economic
   thought, understanding the role of profits in inflationary dynamics is the
   crucial variable. To demonstrate this, we investigate the extensive
   literature on incomes policy, insofar as much of the thinking on
   macroeconomic price controls in peacetime is part of this literature. This
   corpus is crossed by a major schism: some advocate price and wage controls
   while others limit control to wages alone. We show that the defense of
   price controls is always based on the thesis that profits play an
   autonomous role in inflationary dynamics. Conversely, the advocates of an
   incomes policy reduced to wage controls see margins as mere transmission
   belts for excessive wage increases into prices. Price controls are thus
   rejected ex ante, even before any criticism of the consequences of their
   application.
   Keywords: Price controls - Wage controls - Incomes policy - Inflation -
   Unemployment
   JEL: B22 E64 E12
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/search.pf?jel=B22%20E64%20E12>
   Date: 2024
   URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:drm:wpaper:2024-11&r=hpe
   3. The nature of economic exchange: from “interaction” to “transaction”
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04493593>
   By: Emmanuel Petit
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/search.pf?aus=Emmanuel%20Petit> (BSE
   - Bordeaux Sciences Economiques - UB - Université de Bordeaux - CNRS -
   Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)
   Abstract: In economic theory, the term « interaction » is used to
   describe the exchange relationship between agents in the market. In
   semantic terms, the word is used in different ways depending on whether one
   is in a classical model of pure and perfect competition, in a game theory
   model or in institutional economics. The polysemous use of the term
   interaction reveals different methodological positions. Among economists,
   however, the meaning of the term interaction does not fully overlap with
   that of « transaction », identified by John Dewey, in which the entities
   that participate in the exchange are themselves transformed – thus
   suggesting an extension of the analysis of interaction in economics.
   Abstract: En théorie économique, le terme d'interaction est utilisé pour
   qualifier la relation d'échange entre des agents sur le marché. Sur le plan
   sémantique, l'usage du mot recouvre des significations différentes selon
   que l'on se trouve dans un modèle classique de concurrence pure et
   parfaite, dans un modèle de théorie des jeux ou encore à l'intérieur de
   l'économie institutionnelle. L'usage polysémique du terme d'interaction
   révèle notamment des postures méthodologiques différentes. Chez les
   économistes, cependant, la signification du terme d'interaction ne recouvre
   pas totalement celle de « transaction », identifiée par John Dewey, dans
   laquelle les entités qui participent à l'échange sont elles-mêmes
   transformées – laissant ainsi entrevoir un prolongement de l'analyse de
   l'interaction en économie.
   Keywords: Economic exchange, Semantics, Influence, Trans-action,
   Inter-action, échange économique, inter-action, trans-action, influence,
   sémantique
   Date: 2024
   URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04493593&r=hpe
   4. UNCTAD experts as an intellectual basis for developing countries'
   involvement in the reform of the international monetary system. Paper
   presented at the Summer Institute of the Center for the History of
   Political Economy, Duke University, June 19-22, 2023
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04498357>
   By: Raphaël Orange-Leroy
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/search.pf?aus=Rapha%C3%ABl%20Orange-Leroy>
(AGORA
   - EA 7392 - Laboratoire AGORA - CY - CY Cergy Paris Université, IDHES -
   Institutions et Dynamiques Historiques de l'Économie et de la Société - UP1
   - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne - UP8 - Université Paris 8
   Vincennes-Saint-Denis - UPN - Université Paris Nanterre - UEVE - Université
   d'Évry-Val-d'Essonne - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
   - ENS Paris Saclay - Ecole Normale Supérieure Paris-Saclay, CRHIA - Centre
   de recherches en histoire internationale et Atlantique - UR 1163 - ULR - La
   Rochelle Université - Nantes Univ - UFR HHAA - Nantes Université - UFR
   Histoire, Histoire de l'Art et Archéologie - Nantes Université - pôle
   Humanités - Nantes Univ - Nantes Université)
   Abstract: This paper shows that the United Nations Conference on Trade
   and Development (UNCTAD) and the group of 77 developing countries (G77)
   participated in the 1960s international monetary negotiations. This
   involvement was based on the agenda built by a group of experts gathered by
   UNCTAD in 1965. The group was composed of academic and practitioner
   economists from all over the world, including some famous names, such as
   Richard Kahn, Tibor Scitovsky, and Trevor Swan, as well as less-known
   though influential figures, including I. G. Patel, Gamani Corea, and Jorge
   Gonzalez del Valle. UNCTAD served as an "institutional infrastructure"
   (Gasper 2011) that allowed for the emergence of new analyses and narratives
   on the interests of developing countries in the international monetary
   reform that was being discussed among the wealthy countries of the Group of
   Ten (G10). The report of the experts proved influential. At the
   intellectual level, it convinced IMF economists, including Jacques Polak,
   to change their frame of analysis for a more global vision. At the
   political level, it was endorsed by G77 and participated in the G10
   agreement for universal distribution of the newly created Special Drawing
   Rights (SDRs). Based on international organizations' archives, this paper,
   therefore, challenges the invisibilization process of the G10 over G77
   ideas. Multilateral negotiations also offer a "keyhole" to study new
   economist figures from developing countries. Thanks to prosopographic
   methodology, this paper attempts to follow the national and international
   connections of the experts as a way to open new research areas for the
   history of economics.
   Keywords: Diplomatic History, Economic History, International Relations,
   History of Political Economy, United Nations, UNCTAD, IMF, World Bank, G77,
   G10, G24, Global South, Periphery, Third World, Money, Finance,
   Development, Development Finance, Special Drawing Rights, SDRs, economists,
   1960s, 1970s
   Date: 2023–06–19
   URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04498357&r=hpe
   5. Review of “La science est un jeu: La théorie des jeux dans la France
   des années 1950” by Tarik Tazdaït
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/RePEc:osf:socarx:3bd4r>
   By: Leonard, Robert
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/search.pf?aus=Leonard,%20Robert>
   Abstract: Review of “La science est un jeu: La théorie des jeux dans la
   France des années 1950” by Tarik Tazdaït.
   Date: 2024–03–15
   URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:osf:socarx:3bd4r&r=hpe
   6. Cherry-picked Evidence, Selective Quotations, and Irrelevant Sources:
   James Ahiakpor's Persistent Manipulations of the Historical Record on
   Jean-Baptiste Say, Fred Taylor, and Say's Law
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04482952>
   By: Alain Béraud
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/search.pf?aus=Alain%20B%C3%A9raud>
(CREST-THEMA
   - CREST - Centre de Recherche en Économie et Statistique - ENSAI - Ecole
   Nationale de la Statistique et de l'Analyse de l'Information [Bruz] - X -
   École polytechnique - ENSAE Paris - École Nationale de la Statistique et de
   l'Administration Économique - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche
   Scientifique - THEMA - Théorie économique, modélisation et applications -
   CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - CY - CY Cergy Paris
   Université); Guy Numa
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/search.pf?aus=Guy%20Numa> (CSU -
   Colorado State University [Fort Collins])
   Abstract: In a note published in the latest issue of History of Economic
   Ideas, James Ahiakpor rehashes previously debunked claims. After stating
   that our arguments were "misleading" and fantasizing about Jean-Baptiste
   Say's "retrogression, " Ahiakpor now claims to have uncovered "mistaken
   bases of [Fred Manville] Taylor's deviations from Say's own law." Using
   cherry-picked evidence, selective quotations, and irrelevant sources, his
   latest note is another desperate attempt to manipulate the historical
   record. Our peer-reviewed research on Say and Say's Law stands. We have
   engaged the totality of the textual and archival evidence, a task that
   Ahiakpor is still unwilling or unable to perform. An honest and
   comprehensive reading of Say and Taylor's original writings completely
   invalidate Ahiakpor's fallacious conclusions. The present essay shows that
   his claims have no merit. Fred Taylor did correctly analyze Say's message.
   Keywords: Jean-Baptiste Say, Demand, Money, Outlets, Production
   Date: 2023
   URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04482952&r=hpe
   7. Is There Really a Dictator's Dilemma? Information and Repression in
   Autocracy <http://econpapers.repec.org/RePEc:osf:socarx:b94fc>
   By: Gehlbach, Scott
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/search.pf?aus=Gehlbach,%20Scott>; Luo,
   Zhaotian
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/search.pf?aus=Luo,%20Zhaotian>;
Shirikov,
   Anton
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/search.pf?aus=Shirikov,%20Anton>;
Vorobyev,
   Dmitriy
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/search.pf?aus=Vorobyev,%20Dmitriy>
   Abstract: In his seminal work on the political economy of dictatorship,
   Ronald Wintrobe (1998) posited the existence of a "dictator's dilemma, " in
   which repression leaves an autocrat less secure by reducing information
   about discontent. We explore the nature and resolution of this dilemma with
   a formalization that builds on recent work in the political economy of
   nondemocracy. When the regime is sufficiently repressive, and the
   dictator's popularity correspondingly unclear to opposition as well as
   autocrat, the ruler faces two unattractive options: he can mobilize the
   repressive apparatus, even though there may be no threat to his rule, or he
   can refrain from mobilizing, even though the threat may be real.
   Semicompetitive elections can ease the dilemma through the controlled
   revelation of discontent. Depending on the ease of building a repressive
   apparatus, autocrats who manage information in this way may prefer more or
   less repression than Wintrobe's dilemma alone implies.
   Date: 2024–03–21
   URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:osf:socarx:b94fc&r=hpe
   8. Management and Microeconomics: A historical comparison between the
   British and the French traditions
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04489596>
   By: Lise Arena
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/search.pf?aus=Lise%20Arena> (GREDEG
   - Groupe de Recherche en Droit, Economie et Gestion - UNS - Université Nice
   Sophia Antipolis (1965 - 2019) - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche
   Scientifique - UniCA - Université Côte d'Azur); Richard Arena
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/search.pf?aus=Richard%20Arena> (UniCA
   - Université Côte d'Azur)
   Abstract: This article seeks to analyse the circumstances and the nature
   of the emergence of management research from economic analysis in the 1950s
   in Britain and France. It also looks at the more recent shifts in the
   boundaries between these two social sciences; and to understand their
   analytical and methodological significance by taking into account the
   different historical and cultural contexts within which they were embedded.
   Keywords: Microeconomics, Management research, Intellectual traditions,
   Methodology
   Date: 2024
   URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04489596&r=hpe
   9. Shannon-Theil-Rawls: Information Theory, Inequality and the Veil of
   Ignorance <http://econpapers.repec.org/RePEc:inq:inqwps:ecineq2024-669>
   By: Ravi Kanbur
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/search.pf?aus=Ravi%20Kanbur> (Cornell
   University)
   Abstract: This paper shows the power of applying Shannon’s (1948)
   information theory perspective to inequality measurement by considering the
   thought experiment of drawing a dollar at random from an income
   distribution and asking who the dollar came from. The surprise at being
   told who the dollar came from, and the task of designing a set of questions
   with yes/no answers which will get us to the person, are two sides of the
   same coin but with interesting interpretations. The Theil index of
   inequality, which Theil (1967) himself derived with reference to
   information theory and entropy but did not then explore further, is shown
   to have interpretations beyond its simple Daltonian properties such as
   satisfying the principle of transfers or being sub-group decomposable. It
   can be interpreted as a statistical test of the hypothesis of fairness, and
   as a quantitative measure of the difficulty of achieving Rawls’s (1971)
   original position behind the veil of ignorance.
   Keywords: Information Theory, Inequality, Veil of Ignorance
   JEL: D31 D63
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/search.pf?jel=D31%20D63>
   Date: 2024–03
   URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:inq:inqwps:ecineq2024-669&r=hpe

------------------------------
This nep-hpe issue is ©2024 by Erik Thomson
<http://econpapers.repec.org/RAS/pth72.htm>. It is provided as is without
any express or implied warranty. It may be freely redistributed in whole or
in part for any purpose. If distributed in part, please include this notice.
General information on the NEP project can be found at https://nep.repec.org.
For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese
<http://novarese.org/> at <[log in to unmask]>. Put “NEP” in the
subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by
the School of Economics and Finance of Massey University in New Zealand.


ATOM RSS1 RSS2