SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Humberto Barreto <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Societies for the History of Economics <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 19 Feb 2024 06:58:11 -0500
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 kB) , text/html (36 kB)
[Selections by Humberto Barreto for SHOE list.]




nep-hpe <https://nep.repec.org/nep-hpe.html> New Economics Papers
<https://nep.repec.org/> on History and Philosophy of Economics

Issue of 2024‒02‒19
papers chosen by
Erik Thomson <http://econpapers.repec.org/RAS/pth72.htm>,
University of Manitoba <http://umanitoba.ca/>

------------------------------

   1. Bagehot's Classical Money View: A Reconstruction
   <https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/#m_-1181457400962088365_p1> By Perry
   Mehrling
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/search.pf?aus=Perry%20Mehrling>
   2. Non-orthodox Economic Approaches to Labor Unions and Union Leadership
   <https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/#m_-1181457400962088365_p2> By
Drakopoulos,
   Stavros A.
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/search.pf?aus=Drakopoulos,%20Stavros%20A.>
   3. El irrealismo en la Economía estándar: el supuesto de los
   rendimientos decrecientes de escala, como caso paradigmático.
   <https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/#m_-1181457400962088365_p3> By
Vergés-Jaime,
   Joaquim
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/search.pf?aus=Verg%C3%A9s-Jaime,%20Joaquim>
   4. Usury and simony Trading for no price: Thomas Aquinas on money loans,
   sacraments and exchange - Chapter 7
   <https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/#m_-1181457400962088365_p4> By André
   Lapidus
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/search.pf?aus=Andr%C3%A9%20Lapidus>
   ; Pierre Januard
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/search.pf?aus=Pierre%20Januard>
   5. The Horizontal Merger Efficiency Fallacy
   <https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/#m_-1181457400962088365_p5> By Mark
   Glick <http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/search.pf?aus=Mark%20Glick>;
Gabriel
   A. Lozada
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/search.pf?aus=Gabriel%20A.%20Lozada>
   ; Pavitra Govindan
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/search.pf?aus=Pavitra%20Govindan>;
Darren
   Bush <http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/search.pf?aus=Darren%20Bush>
   6. Recent Temporal Dynamics in Economics: Empirical Analyses of Annual
   Publications in Economic Fields
   <https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/#m_-1181457400962088365_p6> By Lutz
   Bornmann
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/search.pf?aus=Lutz%20Bornmann>; Klaus
   Wohlrabe
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/search.pf?aus=Klaus%20Wohlrabe>
   7. The “institutional embeddedness” of prices and valuation in early
   modern Europe
   <https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/#m_-1181457400962088365_p7> By Michela
   Barbot
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/search.pf?aus=Michela%20Barbot>
   8. The Political Economy of Minimum Wage Setting: The Factories and
   Shops Act of Victoria (Australia), 1896-1913
   <https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/#m_-1181457400962088365_p8> By Andrew
   J. Seltzer
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/search.pf?aus=Andrew%20J.%20Seltzer>
   9. The City of Glasgow Bank failure and the case for liability reform
   <https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/#m_-1181457400962088365_p9> By Goodhart,
   C. A. E.
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/search.pf?aus=Goodhart,%20C.%20A.%20E.>
   ; Postel-Vinay, Natacha
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/search.pf?aus=Postel-Vinay,%20Natacha>

------------------------------

   1. Bagehot's Classical Money View: A Reconstruction
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/RePEc:thk:wpaper:inetwp216>
   By: Perry Mehrling
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/search.pf?aus=Perry%20Mehrling> (Pardee
   School of Global Studies at Boston University)
   Abstract: Bagehot is difficult for modern economists to read with
   understanding, for three reasons. He was a classical economist not
   neoclassical, his orientation was global not national, and, most
   importantly, his intellectual formation was as a practicing country banker
   not an academic. This paper adopts all three perspectives, and uses this
   frame to reinterpret his mature work, both Lombard Street and the
   unfinished Economic Studies, as the origin of the key currency tradition
   which continues as a minority view in modern economics.
   Keywords: Bagehot Rule, key currency, money view, Lombard Street, Ricardo
   JEL: B12 B17 B31
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/search.pf?jel=B12%20B17%20B31>
   Date: 2024–01–04
   URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:thk:wpaper:inetwp216&r=hpe
   2. Non-orthodox Economic Approaches to Labor Unions and Union Leadership
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/RePEc:pra:mprapa:119787>
   By: Drakopoulos, Stavros A.
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/search.pf?aus=Drakopoulos,%20Stavros%20A.>
   Abstract: This short paper is the entry on Encyclopedia of Diversity,
   Equity, Inclusion and Spirituality (edited by Marques, J.). Springer, Cham,
   2024. The entry describes the role, function, and nature of labor unions
   and their leadership from a non-orthodox perspective. It shows that since
   the end of the 19th century, a division between orthodox and non-orthodox
   approaches toward the study of labor unions can be discerned. The orthodox
   framework was formed in the late 19th century with the gradual
   establishment of Marginalism, and it consolidated itself with the dominance
   of early neoclassical economics. Orthodox economic theory did not devote
   much attention to the economic analysis of unions. On the contrary and
   during the same period, non-orthodox economists such as Sidney and Beatrice
   Webb and early institutionalists, had paid considerable attention to the
   study of unions, perceiving them as politico-economic organizations and
   emphasizing their wider role as social institutions. The legacy of those
   two approaches continued in the 20th century and contemporary analyses of
   labor unions. The orthodox approach (originating mainly from the work of
   John Dunlop), generally conceives unions as purely economic units,
   analogous to firms, which can be studied by applying the standard tools of
   microeconomic theory. In this framework, the notion of union leadership
   plays a minimum role. In contrast, the non-orthodox viewpoint (originating
   mainly from Arthur Ross’ works), embraces a holistic,
   institutional-political-based attitude to the study of labor unionism.
   Keywords: Trade Unions; Labor Union Leadership, Gender inequality
   JEL: J51 J70 M50
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/search.pf?jel=J51%20J70%20M50>
   Date: 2024–01
   URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:pra:mprapa:119787&r=hpe
   3. El irrealismo en la Economía estándar: el supuesto de los
   rendimientos decrecientes de escala, como caso paradigmático.
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/RePEc:pra:mprapa:119890>
   By: Vergés-Jaime, Joaquim
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/search.pf?aus=Verg%C3%A9s-Jaime,%20Joaquim>
   Abstract: En la economía académicamente dominante el paradigma del
   equilibrio general de mercados competitivos (EG) juega un papel
   fundamental. Aunque los manuales y textos de referencia dediquen páginas a
   hablar de, por ejemplo, el equilibrio en el duopolio, el marco de
   referencia es en el fondo el del paradigma del EG. Éste se basa
   fundamentalmente en la teoría neoclásica de la producción: teoría de la
   empresa y los costes, y de los mercados resultantes; además de en otros
   constructos (homo economicus, información perfecta, etc.). Y a su vez, la
   teoría neoclásica de la producción se sustenta en el axioma de los
   rendimientos decrecientes de escala en la producción de cualquier bien. En
   el presente artículo se expone un análisis de dicho axioma y de los
   supuestos, generalmente implícitos, en los que se basa; y, como tema
   central, se pone de manifiesto que las abrumadoras evidencias empíricas que
   ofrece la observación de nuestras economías de mercado no sustentan en
   absoluto dicho axioma y supuestos. Ni por tanto el modelo explicativo del
   EG, ni las implicaciones normativas de tal paradigma. ENGLISH ABSTRACT: In
   academic mainstream economics, the paradigm of the general equilibrium of
   competitive markets (GE) plays a fundamental role. Although textbooks and
   reference texts devote pages to talk about, for example, duopoly’s
   equilibrium, the frame of reference is basically that of the GE paradigm;
   which is based fundamentally on the neoclassical theory of production: a
   theory of the firm and its costs, prices determination, and of the
   resulting markets, as well as on other constructs (homo economicus, perfect
   information, etc.). And, in turn, this neoclassical theory of production
   relies on the axiom of the decreasing returns to scale in the production of
   any product or service. This paper presents an analysis of such axiom and
   of the assumptions, usually implicit, on which they rely; and, as a central
   topic, it shows that the overwhelming empirical evidence offered by the
   observation of our market economies does not support this axiom and
   deductive assumptions at all. Neither therefore the GE’s explanatory model,
   nor the normative implications of such a paradigm.
   Keywords: Mainstream Economics and empirical testing; Assumptions and
   axioms in Economics; Socio-political implications of Economics; The
   traditional assumption of ‘decreasing returns to scale’.
   JEL: A10 D01 D21 D22 D40
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/search.pf?jel=A10%20D01%20D21%20D22%20D40>
   Date: 2023
   URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:pra:mprapa:119890&r=hpe
   4. Usury and simony Trading for no price: Thomas Aquinas on money loans,
   sacraments and exchange - Chapter 7
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04396111>
   By: André Lapidus
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/search.pf?aus=Andr%C3%A9%20Lapidus>
(PHARE
   - Philosophie, Histoire et Analyse des Représentations Économiques - UP1 -
   Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne); Pierre Januard
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/search.pf?aus=Pierre%20Januard>
   Abstract: Throughout the Middle Ages, the charging of interest on
   monetary loans, as well as the sale of sacraments, were generally
   considered to be special types of sins: respectively, usury and simony. The
   repeated condemnations of these acts suggests to the contemporary reader
   that they could be viewed as prefigurations of contested commodities.
   Relying on Thomas Aquinas's works written in the second half of the 13th
   century, it is shown in this chapter that money and sacraments were indeed
   viewed as exchanged, though, in a sense, as traded for no price. The result
   is the existence, in the framework of exchange, of various situations which
   might be ranked according to increasing commodification: first, an absolute
   non-commodification for the money loan, whose price is zero due to the
   prohibition of the payment of interest to the lender due to the loan
   itself, although an indemnity can be paid for other reasons and, from an
   economic viewpoint, appears as a counterpart for the opportunity cost of
   the loan. Then, two ways of expressing a kind of commodification in dealing
   with the sacraments: a lexical commodification in which sacraments do have
   a "price", as Aquinas mentioned, but one that is out of reach on this
   earth; and a partial operational commodification, again for sacraments
   (especially for the Eucharist through mass offerings), in which something
   like an exchange for sacraments takes place, not at an impossible price but
   according to a kind of tariff which allows the priest to live.
   Keywords: Thomas Aquinas, Simony, Usury, Money loans, Sacraments, Just
   price, Commodification
   Date: 2024
   URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04396111&r=hpe
   5. The Horizontal Merger Efficiency Fallacy
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/RePEc:thk:wpaper:inetwp212>
   By: Mark Glick
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/search.pf?aus=Mark%20Glick> (University
   of Utah); Gabriel A. Lozada
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/search.pf?aus=Gabriel%20A.%20Lozada>
(University
   of Utah); Pavitra Govindan
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/search.pf?aus=Pavitra%20Govindan>
(University
   of Utah); Darren Bush
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/search.pf?aus=Darren%20Bush>
(University
   of Houston Law Center)
   Abstract: The Department of Justice and Federal Trade Commission Merger
   Guidelines (the "Merger Guidelines"), including the much improved latest
   revision in 2023 (the "New Merger Guidelines"), have continued to
   perpetrate what we call in this paper the horizontal merger efficiency
   fallacy. The fallacy arises because in the Guidelines the term
   "efficiencies" has become unmoored from its foundations in economic theory
   and has been reduced to the business school construct of cost savings. We
   show that cost savings can only be considered universally socially
   beneficial by acceptance of what is termed "the Consumer Welfare Standard"
   (antitrust) or "the surplus theory of welfare" (economics), a theory that
   has been discredited and abandoned by welfare economists. In economic
   theory, efficiency means Pareto Efficiency. We explore the various attempts
   to tether the cost savings definition of efficiency to Pareto Efficiency
   and explain why these attempts have failed. We conclude that there is no
   sound way to theoretically reconcile cost savings with the economic meaning
   of efficiencies. We then move beyond the efficiency fallacy and show how
   modern welfare economics can be used to integrate Congressional antitrust
   goals into the New Merger Guidelines. This requires abandoning the
   unsupported "standard deduction" for efficiencies and replacing it with an
   evidence-based assessment of how a specific merger under review potentially
   impacts Congressional antitrust goals. This change renders the present
   efficiency rebuttal section of the New Merger Guidelines superfluous, and
   we provide specific reasons why this section as currently drafted is flawed
   and should be jettisoned.
   Keywords: Antitrust, Efficiency, Consumer Welfare, Merger Regulation,
   Merger Guidelines
   JEL: D4 D6 L4 L5
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/search.pf?jel=D4%20D6%20L4%20L5>
   Date: 2023–08–24
   URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:thk:wpaper:inetwp212&r=hpe
   6. Recent Temporal Dynamics in Economics: Empirical Analyses of Annual
   Publications in Economic Fields
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/RePEc:ces:ceswps:_10881>
   By: Lutz Bornmann
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/search.pf?aus=Lutz%20Bornmann>; Klaus
   Wohlrabe
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/search.pf?aus=Klaus%20Wohlrabe>
   Abstract: Differences in annual publication counts may reflect the
   dynamic of scientific progress. Declining annual numbers of publications
   may be interpreted as missing progress in field-specific knowledge. In this
   paper, we present empirical results on dynamics of progress in economic
   fields (defined by JEL codes) based on a methodological approach introduced
   by Bornmann and Haunschild (2022). We focused on publications that have
   been published between 2012 and 2021 and identified those fields in
   economics with the highest dynamics (largest rates of change in paper
   counts). We found that the field with the largest paper output across the
   years is ‘Economic Development’. The results reveal that the field-specific
   rates of changes are mostly similar. However, the two fields ‘Production
   and Organizations’ and ‘Health’ show point estimators which are clearly
   higher than the estimators for the other fields. We investigated the
   publications in ‘Production and Organizations’ and ‘Health’ in more detail.
   Keywords: scientometrics, bibliometrics, dynamics of research fields,
   economics, JEL code
   JEL: A10 A12 A14
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/search.pf?jel=A10%20A12%20A14>
   Date: 2024
   URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ces:ceswps:_10881&r=hpe
   7. The “institutional embeddedness” of prices and valuation in early
   modern Europe <http://econpapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04373041>
   By: Michela Barbot
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/search.pf?aus=Michela%20Barbot> (IDHES
   - Institutions et Dynamiques Historiques de l'Économie et de la Société -
   UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne - UP8 - Université Paris 8
   Vincennes-Saint-Denis - UPN - Université Paris Nanterre - UEVE - Université
   d'Évry-Val-d'Essonne - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
   - ENS Paris Saclay - Ecole Normale Supérieure Paris-Saclay)
   Abstract: How was the correlation between prices and value understood
   before the birth of economic science? And what were the institutional and
   material foundations of valuation procedures? The field of civil law offers
   an interesting perspective to explore these questions as it allows to
   analyse the plurality of means by which the preindustrial societies coped
   with a common challenge: reducing the risk of price conflicts in order to
   ensure the enforcement of contractual commitments.
   Abstract: Comment la dialectique entre les prix et la valeur des biens
   était-elle appréhendée avant d'entrer dans le giron de la science
   économique ? Et quels étaient les fondements institutionnels et matériels
   des opérations d'estimation ? La sphère du droit civil offre un angle
   intéressant pour répondre à ces questions puisqu'elle permet d'observer la
   pluralité des solutions que les sociétés d'Ancien Régime ont apportées à un
   même défi : celui de réduire le risque de conflits sur les prix afin de
   garantir le respect des accords contractuels.
   Keywords: Price, values, institutions, law, contracts
   Date: 2023
   URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04373041&r=hpe
   8. The Political Economy of Minimum Wage Setting: The Factories and
   Shops Act of Victoria (Australia), 1896-1913
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/RePEc:auu:hpaper:118>
   By: Andrew J. Seltzer
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/search.pf?aus=Andrew%20J.%20Seltzer>
   Abstract: The Victorian Factories and Shops Act of 1896, the second
   minimum wage law in the world, empowered administrative agencies ("Special
   Boards") to set trade-specific minimum rates based on age, sex, and
   occupation. Much like modern debates, Victorian supporters of minimum wages
   argued that they would protect vulnerable workers while opponents argued
   that they would increase employers’ costs, resulting in unintended
   consequences for workers. Evidence from the actual minimum wages passed
   under the Act suggests that Boards were loosely constrained by market
   factors, but also that they had some discretion in minimum wage setting.
   This discretion was used differently by individual Boards; some essentially
   followed the market for their trades while others set minimum rates that
   were binding for at least some workers. To the extent that rates were
   binding, they tended to reduce inequality among adult male workers,
   particularly after a 1907 Federal ruling established a living wage for
   employers with operations in multiple states. However, minimum wages also
   increased inequality across groups, increasing wages of adult men relative
   to those of women and youths. The Act formally institutionalised
   gender-based pay differences, a practice that continued in Australian
   minimum wage setting for over 70 years.
   Keywords: Minimum wages, Australia, Protective Legislation
   JEL: N47 N37 J88
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/search.pf?jel=N47%20N37%20J88>
   Date: 2024–02
   URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:auu:hpaper:118&r=hpe
   9. The City of Glasgow Bank failure and the case for liability reform
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/RePEc:ehl:wpaper:121956>
   By: Goodhart, C. A. E.
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/search.pf?aus=Goodhart,%20C.%20A.%20E.>
   ; Postel-Vinay, Natacha
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/search.pf?aus=Postel-Vinay,%20Natacha>
   Abstract: The City of Glasgow Bank failure in 1878, which led to large
   numbers of shareholders becoming insolvent, generated great public concern
   about their plight, and led directly to the 1879 Companies Act, which paved
   the way for the adoption of limited liability for all shareholders. In this
   paper, we focus on the question of why the opportunity was not taken to
   distinguish between the appropriate liability for ‘insiders, ’ i.e. those
   with direct access to information and power over decisions, as contrasted
   with ‘outsiders.’ We record that such issues were raised and discussed at
   the time, and we report why proposals for any such graded liability were
   turned down. We argue that the reasons for rejecting graded liability for
   insiders were overstated, both then and subsequently. While we believe that
   the case for such graded liability needs reconsideration, it does remain a
   complex matter, as discussed in Section 4.
   Keywords: corporate governance; limited liability; bank risk-taking;
   financial regulation; financial crises; senior management regime; banks;
   banking
   JEL: G21 G28 G30 G32 G39 N23 K22 K29 L20
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/search.pf?jel=G21%20G28%20G30%20G32%20G39%20N23%20K22%20K29%20L20>
   Date: 2024–02–01
   URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ehl:wpaper:121956&r=hpe

------------------------------
This nep-hpe issue is ©2024 by Erik Thomson
<http://econpapers.repec.org/RAS/pth72.htm>. It is provided as is without
any express or implied warranty. It may be freely redistributed in whole or
in part for any purpose. If distributed in part, please include this notice.
General information on the NEP project can be found at https://nep.repec.org.
For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese
<http://novarese.org/> at <[log in to unmask]>. Put “NEP” in the
subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by
the School of Economics and Finance of Massey University in New Zealand.


ATOM RSS1 RSS2