SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Hammond, Daniel" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Societies for the History of Economics <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 16 Dec 2015 15:14:50 -0500
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (2425 bytes) , text/html (7 kB)
I don't recall who was there in 1978, but through the years a number of
Buchanan's students were on the Clemson faculty.

Dan Hammond

On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 1:48 PM, Spencer Banzhaf <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

>
>
> "South Carolina" does not have to mean the University of South Carolina,
> does it?  It could mean the state, in which case it could have been
> somebody at Clemson U.  It has a liberal tradition and also folks
> interested in political economy.  And folks from Chi and from UCLA.
>
>
>
> There are several people who were there in '78 who grew in academic
> reputation, but I doubt Hayek would be talking about them -- but perhaps
> there was an earlier generation I do not know.
>
>
>
> *From:* Societies for the History of Economics [mailto:[log in to unmask]] *On
> Behalf Of *E. Roy Weintraub
> *Sent:* Wednesday, December 16, 2015 11:23 AM
> *To:* [log in to unmask]
> *Subject:* Re: [SHOE] 'Liberty' in South Carolina
>
>
>
> No, it would not, since Clower was at UCLA until at least the late 80s.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 10:23 AM, Ric Holt <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> Yes, Bob Clower would make sense.
>
>
>
> Ric Holt
>
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 5:45 AM, Colander, David C. <
> [log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> It could have been Bob  Clower
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>
> On Dec 16, 2015, at 8:41 AM, Robert Leeson <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>
> In 1978, Hayek stated
>
>
>
> I am rather hoping that these ideas are now spreading. Of course, I think
> the main thing is that there are economists who are working outside their
> fields, like Jim Buchanan and [the one] in South Carolina, and some of the
> people working at UCLA. What I said before--that you cannot be a good
> economist except by being more than an economist-- I think is being
> recognized by more and more of the economists. This narrow specialization,
> particularly of the mathematical economists, is, I believe, going out.
>
>
>
> Hayek plagiarized material from John C. Calhoun: but what in South
> Carolina is Hayek referring to?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> E. Roy Weintraub
> Professor of Economics
>
> Fellow, Center for the History of Political Economy
> <http://hope.econ.duke.edu/>
>
> Duke University
> www.econ.duke.edu/~erw/erw.homepage.html
>
> https://www.facebook.com/FindingEquilibriumDuppeWeintraub
> <http://press.princeton.edu/titles/10206.html>
>
>
>
>
>



-- 
J. Daniel Hammond
Hultquist Family Professor
Department Chair
Department of Economics
Wake Forest University
Winston-Salem, NC 27109
336-758-5335


ATOM RSS1 RSS2