[Selections by Humberto Barreto for SHOE list.]

nep-hpe <http://nep.repec.org/nep-hpe.html> New Economics Papers
<http://nep.repec.org/> on History and Philosophy of Economics

Issue of 2022‒05‒09
papers chosen by
Erik Thomson <http://econpapers.repec.org/RAS/pth72.htm>
University of Manitoba <http://umanitoba.ca/>
------------------------------

   1. Joan Robinson in 1942, an encounter between Marxian Economics and
   Macroeconomics
   <https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/#m_-5407435471072926321_p1> By Alves,
   C. <http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/search.pf?aus=Alves,%20C.>
   2. Escrevendo a história do pensamento econômico-ecológico: desafios e
   perspectivas
   <https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/#m_-5407435471072926321_p2> By Marco
   P. Vianna Franco
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/search.pf?aus=Marco%20P.%20Vianna%20Franco>
   ; Antoine Missemer
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/search.pf?aus=Antoine%20Missemer>
   3. Understanding the bitterness of Wassily Leontief: Postwar success and
   failures of input-output techniques
   <https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/#m_-5407435471072926321_p3> By Vincent
   Carret
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/search.pf?aus=Vincent%20Carret>
   4. Categorical versus graded beliefs
   <https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/#m_-5407435471072926321_p5> By Franz
   Dietrich
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/search.pf?aus=Franz%20Dietrich>
   5. The pluralistic foundations of conceptual veiling
   <https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/#m_-5407435471072926321_p6> By Morley,
   Julia <http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/search.pf?aus=Morley,%20Julia>
   6. A pragmatist critique of the economic theory of the commons
   <https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/#m_-5407435471072926321_p7> By Philippe
   Lorino
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/search.pf?aus=Philippe%20Lorino>

------------------------------

   1. Joan Robinson in 1942, an encounter between Marxian Economics and
   Macroeconomics <http://econpapers.repec.org/RePEc:cam:camdae:2226>
   By: Alves, C.
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/search.pf?aus=Alves,%20C.>
   Abstract: This paper revisits why Joan Robinson turned to Karl Marx in
   1942 and which insights from Marxian economics she sought to incorporate
   into her later works, while commenting on the legacies of this encounter
   and how was received by some her of contemporaries. By the end of the
   1930s, Robinson wanted to bring academic and Marxian economics together in
   a search for a more realist theory of the rate of profit and income
   distribution, and clarifications on Keynes’s concept of full employment,
   the nature of technical progress and a long-period theory within the
   Keynesian framework. The result, An Essay on Marxian Economics (1942), was
   her most important work in terms of laying the foundations of her enduring
   challenge to the orthodox economics. Here she relied on Marxian insights to
   escape Marshallian orthodoxy. It is the story of how the originator of
   imperfect competition pushed further into a theory of exploitation.
   Keywords: Joan Robinson, Marxian Economics, Rate of Profit, Exploitation
   JEL: B2 B22 B24 B31 B40
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/search.pf?jel=B2%20B22%20B24%20B31%20B40>
   Date: 2022–04–11
   URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:cam:camdae:2226&r=
   2. Escrevendo a história do pensamento econômico-ecológico: desafios e
   perspectivas <http://econpapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03572043>
   By: Marco P. Vianna Franco
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/search.pf?aus=Marco%20P.%20Vianna%20Franco>
(Konrad
   Lorenz Institute for Evolution and Cognition Research - Partenaires
INRAE); Antoine
   Missemer
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/search.pf?aus=Antoine%20Missemer> (CNRS
   - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, CIRED - Centre
   International de Recherche sur l'Environnement et le Développement - Cirad
   - Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le
   Développement - EHESS - École des hautes études en sciences sociales -
   AgroParisTech - ENPC - École des Ponts ParisTech - Université Paris-Saclay
   - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)
   Abstract: The history of ecological economic thought (EET) has been
   addressed in different ways and according to multifarious foundations,
   given the evolving character of conceptions of natural processes and
   economic phenomena. This article proposes a theoretical framework for
   understanding EET as the set of ideas bridging the social and the natural
   worlds by means of shared ontologies and epistemologies. These ideas stand
   against the human-nature divide which characterizes modern Western thought,
   contribute to thinking about contemporary sustainability challenges, and
   offer a more structured intellectual history of the roots of ecological
   economics. The article argues that writing the history of EET calls for an
   appraisal of historiographical challenges, in particular the risks posed by
   presentism and anachronism. It also reviews the literature engaging with
   the history of EET and, finally, identifies new lines of research,
   especially in terms of global narratives.
   Abstract: A história do pensamento econômico-ecológico (PEE) tem sido
   construída de diversas formas e de acordo com diferentes fundamentos, dado
   o caráter evolutivo de conceitos relacionados a processos naturais e
   econômicos. Este artigo propõe um arcabouço teórico para se entender o PEE
   como um conjunto de ideias interligando as esferas social e natural por
   meio de ontologias e epistemologias compartilhadas. Essas ideias se opõem a
   dicotomias entre o humano e o natural que caracterizam o pensamento
   ocidental moderno, contribuindo para a elucidação de desafios
   contemporâneos no contexto da sustentabilidade e oferecendo uma história
   intelectual estruturada das raízes da economia ecológica. O artigo defende
   que escrever a história do PEE requer o escrutínio dos desafios
   historiográficos, em particular dos riscos associados ao presentismo e ao
   anacronismo; além disso, ele traz uma revisão da literatura sobre PEE e,
   finalmente, identifica novas linhas de pesquisa com destaque para
   narrativas globais.
   Keywords: intellectual history,strong
   interdisciplinarity,historiography,ecological economics,longue
   durée,economia ecológica,história intelectual,interdisciplinaridade
   forte,historiografia
   Date: 2022
   URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03572043&r=
   3. Understanding the bitterness of Wassily Leontief: Postwar success and
   failures of input-output techniques
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:wpaper:halshs-03603527>
   By: Vincent Carret
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/search.pf?aus=Vincent%20Carret>
(TRIANGLE
   - Triangle : action, discours, pensée politique et économique - CNRS -
   Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - IEP Lyon - Sciences Po Lyon
   - Institut d'études politiques de Lyon - Université de Lyon - UJM -
   Université Jean Monnet [Saint-Étienne] - UL2 - Université Lumière - Lyon 2
   - ENS Lyon - École normale supérieure - Lyon)
   Abstract: Although Leontief was and still is one of the most recognized
   names in economics, inextricably linked to the development of input-output
   techniques, he remained fiercely critical of other economists' works and of
   the state of economic science during his whole life. To understand his
   bitterness, we go back to the root of the split between Leontief and the
   rest of the economics profession, through an examination of the debates
   that took place in the late 1940s. From his input-output model, conceived
   as an operational theory of economic interdependencies, Leontief drew a
   specific approach to economic policy and planning which had a lot of
   success with government agencies, explaining how he could durably sustain
   his split from the profession.
   Date: 2022–03–09
   URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:hal:wpaper:halshs-03603527&r=
   4. Categorical versus graded beliefs
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-03615028>
   By: Franz Dietrich
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/search.pf?aus=Franz%20Dietrich> (PSE
   - Paris School of Economics - ENPC - École des Ponts ParisTech - ENS-PSL -
   École normale supérieure - Paris - PSL - Université Paris sciences et
   lettres - UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne - CNRS - Centre
   National de la Recherche Scientifique - EHESS - École des hautes études en
   sciences sociales - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour
   l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement, CES - Centre d'économie
   de la Sorbonne - UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne - CNRS - Centre
   National de la Recherche Scientifique)
   Abstract: This essay discusses the difficulty to reconcile two paradigms
   about beliefs: the binary or categorical paradigm of yes/no beliefs and the
   probabilistic paradigm of degrees of belief. The possibility for someone to
   hold beliefs of both types simultaneously is challenged by the lottery
   paradox, and more recently by a general impossibility theorem by Dietrich
   and List. The nature, relevance, and implications of the tension are
   explained and assessed.
   Keywords: impossibility theorem,lottery paradox,belief
   binarization,subjective probability,yes/no belief vs. graded belief,logic
   vs. rational choice theory,binary belief,credence
   Date: 2022
   URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-03615028&r=
   5. The pluralistic foundations of conceptual veiling
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/RePEc:ehl:lserod:114359>
   By: Morley, Julia
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/search.pf?aus=Morley,%20Julia>
   Abstract: The theoretical foundations of Karthik Ramanna's "Unreliable
   Accounts"are investigated, demonstrating the pluralistic approach which
   underlies his critique of the accountability and governance of the FASB. In
   particular, I highlight Ramanna's use of multiple units of analysis and
   theoretical frameworks in his arguments for the existence of conceptual
   veiling, but I question the extent to which extent Ramanna's account can be
   viewed as a generalisable causal explanation. Finally, avenues for future
   research are noted.
   Keywords: accounting; regulation; theoretical pluralism; De Gruyter deal
   JEL: M41 <http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/search.pf?jel=M41>
   Date: 2022–02–25
   URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ehl:lserod:114359&r=
   6. A pragmatist critique of the economic theory of the commons
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03590535>
   By: Philippe Lorino
   <http://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/search.pf?aus=Philippe%20Lorino> (ESSEC
   Business School - Essec Business School)
   Date: 2022–01–04
   URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03590535&r=

------------------------------
This nep-hpe issue is ©2022 by  <http://econpapers.repec.org/RAS/pth72.htm>Erik
Thomson. It is provided as is without any express or implied warranty. It
may be freely redistributed in whole or in part for any purpose. If
distributed in part, please include this notice.
General information on the NEP project can be found at http://nep.repec.org.
For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese
<http://novarese.org/> at <[log in to unmask]>. Put “NEP” in the
subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by
the School of Economics and Finance of Massey University in New Zealand.