Dear All:
  
 In my view,we need a "backbone" to teach history of economic thought,which Mrs Marcuzzo addressed in the ‍article titled "Is History of Economic Thought a "serious" subject?" .
  
 Sincerely
  
 Yi Hu
  

 

 ------------------ 原始邮件 ------------------
  发件人: "James Henderson";<[log in to unmask]>;
 发送时间: 2014年8月7日(星期四) 凌晨0:51
 收件人: "SHOE"<[log in to unmask]>; 
 
 主题: Re: [SHOE] HET classics

 

 One place to start would be to review an older classic collection.  Try James A. Gherity --  Economic Thought a Historical Anthology. 

 Sounds like a great project.  Good Luck
 Jim H. 

 

 On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 10:27 AM, Robert Cord <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
 Dear all

Given the ongoing debate about how students (and possibly teachers) should
be more exposed to history of economic thought, I've been thinking about
ways of how this may be achieved. One possibility might be to put together
a collection of reprints of classic articles and chapters which examine
the subject itself (e.g. why it should be studied, methodology, etc.)
and/or classic pieces which have examined specific HET
episodes/periods/ideas. And so my inevitable question to the list: What
should, and should not, be included in such a volume?

All the best

Bob