LISTSERV - SHOE Archives - LISTSERV.YORKU.CA

SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

	LISTSERV Archives
	SHOE Home

	Log In
	Register

	Subscribe or Unsubscribe

	Search Archives

Options:	Use Forum View Use Monospaced Font Show HTML Part by Default Show All Mail Headers
Message:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Subject:	Re: 'Liberty' in South Carolina
From:	Spencer Banzhaf <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:	Societies for the History of Economics <[log in to unmask]>
Date:	Wed, 16 Dec 2015 18:48:15 +0000
Content-Type:	multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:	text/plain (2171 bytes) , text/html (7 kB)

"South Carolina" does not have to mean the University of South Carolina, does it?  It could mean the state, in which case it could have been somebody at Clemson U.  It has a liberal tradition and also folks interested in political economy.  And folks from Chi and from UCLA.

There are several people who were there in '78 who grew in academic reputation, but I doubt Hayek would be talking about them -- but perhaps there was an earlier generation I do not know.

From: Societies for the History of Economics [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of E. Roy Weintraub
Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2015 11:23 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [SHOE] 'Liberty' in South Carolina

No, it would not, since Clower was at UCLA until at least the late 80s.

On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 10:23 AM, Ric Holt <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
Yes, Bob Clower would make sense.

Ric Holt

On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 5:45 AM, Colander, David C. <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
It could have been Bob  Clower

Sent from my iPhone

On Dec 16, 2015, at 8:41 AM, Robert Leeson <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:

In 1978, Hayek stated

I am rather hoping that these ideas are now spreading. Of course, I think the main thing is that there are economists who are working outside their fields, like Jim Buchanan and [the one] in South Carolina, and some of the people working at UCLA. What I said before--that you cannot be a good economist except by being more than an economist-- I think is being recognized by more and more of the economists. This narrow specialization, particularly of the mathematical economists, is, I believe, going out.

Hayek plagiarized material from John C. Calhoun: but what in South Carolina is Hayek referring to?

--
E. Roy Weintraub
Professor of Economics
Fellow, Center for the History of Political Economy<http://hope.econ.duke.edu/>
Duke University
www.econ.duke.edu/~erw/erw.homepage.html<http://www.econ.duke.edu/~erw/erw.homepage.html>
https://www.facebook.com/FindingEquilibriumDuppeWeintraub<http://press.princeton.edu/titles/10206.html>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTSERV.YORKU.CA