SHOE Archives

Societies for the History of Economics

SHOE@YORKU.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Ric Holt <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Societies for the History of Economics <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 16 Dec 2015 07:23:08 -0800
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (905 bytes) , text/html (2842 bytes)
Yes, Bob Clower would make sense.

Ric Holt

On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 5:45 AM, Colander, David C. <[log in to unmask]
> wrote:

> It could have been Bob  Clower
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Dec 16, 2015, at 8:41 AM, Robert Leeson <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>
> In 1978, Hayek stated
>
>
>
> I am rather hoping that these ideas are now spreading. Of course, I think
> the main thing is that there are economists who are working outside their
> fields, like Jim Buchanan and [the one] in South Carolina, and some of the
> people working at UCLA. What I said before--that you cannot be a good
> economist except by being more than an economist-- I think is being
> recognized by more and more of the economists. This narrow specialization,
> particularly of the mathematical economists, is, I believe, going out.
>
>
>
> Hayek plagiarized material from John C. Calhoun: but what in South
> Carolina is Hayek referring to?
>
>
>
>
>
>


ATOM RSS1 RSS2